[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org |
Date: |
Sun, 7 Jul 2019 17:15:54 +0000 |
xrs transcribed 3.7K bytes:
>
>
> On Sat, 6 Jul 2019 14:24:53 +0000
> address@hidden wrote:
>
> > Christian Grothoff transcribed 4.2K bytes:
> > > On 7/6/19 2:19 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> > > > Christian Grothoff transcribed 3.2K bytes:
> > > >> On 7/5/19 8:19 PM, xrs wrote:
> > > >>> Hi all,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'd like to put doxygen again in place. I propose:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 0. install a weekly cronjob for user doxygen and do "make full"
> > > >>> in the respective folder.
> > > >>
> > > >> weekly is excessively slow, daily or hourly would be fine I
> > > >> think.
> > > >>> 1. Create two URLs
> > > >>> a. https://docs.gnunet.org/handbook/
> > > >>> b. https://docs.gnunet.org/doxygen
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Is this a good idea? I know it's not precise enough.
> > > >>
> > > >> I'd prefer to keep the full handbook under docs at the top-level
> > > >> (also to avoid breaking links again!), and just do
> > > >> doxygen.gnunet.org for doxygen.
> > > >
> > > > This is not what we have talked about in the beginning of the docs
> > > > discussion. I don't expect you to remember this, but I think there
> > > > are still open tickets which point out that this gathering of
> > > > subdomains is a temporary state, and you even agreed that this is
> > > > temporary. I mean we can
> > > > still redirect with regexp, it's easy.
> > >
> > > Yes, but messy (to really capture all links) and slows down the
> > > user, so we should avoid it if we can.
> > >
> > > > I would like to do what Taler
> > > > did and use a docs landing page, and not have 1 new subdomain for
> > > > every new feature which is related to text one can read. This will
> > > > end up confusing people where to read about this.
> > > > If you want the subdomains, the docs.* (or whatever) page can link
> > > > to them, but outside of gnunet.org having a central landing page
> > > > is good, having one toplevel subdomain for all of this would be
> > > > better.
> > >
> > > Ok, but then we should change this ASAP and update the links (when
> > > we originally discussed this, I also had not anticipated people
> > > adding links to the handbook as quickly as it happened at the
> > > GNUnet Hacker meeting...).
> >
> > Me neither, and that is good :)
> >
> > Maybe a task for the meeting in Berlin? The /docs/
> > page in its raw form could be created in a couple of hours.
>
> I'd like to do this as pronto as possible :) At the end of next week?
> Here is the plan:
> - on sam create different aliases in /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/docs-ssl
> for docs.gnunet.org/<alias1|alias2|...> pointing to respective
> folders
> - install cronjob to do "make full" in /home/gnunet9/gnunet/doc
>
> Okay? I'd need a helping root-hand ^^
Only christian has root on sam.
> cheers,
> xrs
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, xrs, 2019/07/05
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, Christian Grothoff, 2019/07/05
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, xrs, 2019/07/05
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, ng0, 2019/07/06
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, ng0, 2019/07/06
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, Christian Grothoff, 2019/07/06
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, ng0, 2019/07/06
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, xrs, 2019/07/07
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org,
ng0 <=
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, Christian Grothoff, 2019/07/07