[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Jul 2019 14:24:53 +0000 |
Christian Grothoff transcribed 4.2K bytes:
> On 7/6/19 2:19 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> > Christian Grothoff transcribed 3.2K bytes:
> >> On 7/5/19 8:19 PM, xrs wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to put doxygen again in place. I propose:
> >>>
> >>> 0. install a weekly cronjob for user doxygen and do "make full" in the
> >>> respective folder.
> >>
> >> weekly is excessively slow, daily or hourly would be fine I think.
> >>
> >>> 1. Create two URLs
> >>> a. https://docs.gnunet.org/handbook/
> >>> b. https://docs.gnunet.org/doxygen
> >>>
> >>> Is this a good idea? I know it's not precise enough.
> >>
> >> I'd prefer to keep the full handbook under docs at the top-level (also
> >> to avoid breaking links again!), and just do doxygen.gnunet.org for
> >> doxygen.
> >
> > This is not what we have talked about in the beginning of the docs
> > discussion. I don't expect you to remember this, but I think there
> > are still open tickets which point out that this gathering of
> > subdomains is a temporary state, and you even agreed that this is
> > temporary. I mean we can
> > still redirect with regexp, it's easy.
>
> Yes, but messy (to really capture all links) and slows down the user, so
> we should avoid it if we can.
>
> > I would like to do what Taler
> > did and use a docs landing page, and not have 1 new subdomain for
> > every new feature which is related to text one can read. This will
> > end up confusing people where to read about this.
> > If you want the subdomains, the docs.* (or whatever) page can link
> > to them, but outside of gnunet.org having a central landing page
> > is good, having one toplevel subdomain for all of this would be
> > better.
>
> Ok, but then we should change this ASAP and update the links (when we
> originally discussed this, I also had not anticipated people adding
> links to the handbook as quickly as it happened at the GNUnet Hacker
> meeting...).
Me neither, and that is good :)
Maybe a task for the meeting in Berlin? The /docs/
page in its raw form could be created in a couple of hours.
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, xrs, 2019/07/05
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, Christian Grothoff, 2019/07/05
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, xrs, 2019/07/05
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, ng0, 2019/07/06
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, ng0, 2019/07/06
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, Christian Grothoff, 2019/07/06
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org,
ng0 <=
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, xrs, 2019/07/07
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, ng0, 2019/07/07
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Revive doxygen on gnunet.org, Christian Grothoff, 2019/07/07