Re: [GNUnet-developers] clang formatting discussion

[ng0]

I've been playing around with clang-format a bit more.

@@ -239,7 +239,8 @@ GNUNET_TIME_absolute_get_forever_ ()
  * Convert relative time to an absolute time in the
  * future.
  *
- * @return timestamp that is "rel" in the future, or FOREVER if rel==FOREVER 
(or if we would overflow)
+ * @return timestamp that is "rel" in the future, or FOREVER if rel==FOREVER 
(or
+ * if we would overflow)
  */


would this cause problems with doxygen?

In general it's uhm... weird. But I guess we're mostly okay
with clang-format then it seems. I disagree with some of
its suggestions, like

@@ -927,8 +929,7 @@ GNUNET_TIME_absolute_get_monotonic (const struct 
GNUNET_CONFIGURATION_Handle *cf
 /**
  * Destructor
  */
-void __attribute__ ((destructor))
-GNUNET_util_time_fini ()
+void __attribute__ ((destructor)) GNUNET_util_time_fini ()
 {
   (void) GNUNET_TIME_absolute_get_monotonic (NULL);
 }


but I guess you have to make compromises once you rely on
such a tool.