Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again?

[Christian Grothoff]

On 2/7/19 3:21 PM, Hartmut Goebel wrote:
> Am 02.02.19 um 16:09 schrieb Christian Grothoff:
>> And I wonder if it wouldn't make sense to have the gnunet.git
>> configure.ac test for Gtk+ and *if* libgtk is detected, _then_ build Gtk
>> GUIs that are _included_ in gnunet.git, instead of requiring the user to
>> download and configure yet another TGZ.
> 
> *If* the gui is merged into the main repo, I suggest adding
> configure-options like `--without-gui`(which AFAIK is a autotools
> standard thing) to avoid building the gui even if libgtk is detected.
> This might happen if e.g. one is developing on her/his desktop.

Sure, that makes sense. Any opinions from the silent masses on merging
gnunet-gtk.git into gnunet.git and merging the source TGZs?