Re: [GNUnet-developers] Proposal: Make GNUnet Great Again?

[Hartmut Goebel]

Am 02.02.19 um 16:09 schrieb Christian Grothoff:
> And I wonder if it wouldn't make sense to have the gnunet.git
> configure.ac test for Gtk+ and *if* libgtk is detected, _then_ build Gtk
> GUIs that are _included_ in gnunet.git, instead of requiring the user to
> download and configure yet another TGZ.

*If* the gui is merged into the main repo, I suggest adding
configure-options like `--without-gui`(which AFAIK is a autotools
standard thing) to avoid building the gui even if libgtk is detected.
This might happen if e.g. one is developing on her/his desktop.

-- 
Schönen Gruß
Hartmut Goebel
Dipl.-Informatiker (univ), CISSP, CSSLP, ISO 27001 Lead Implementer
Information Security Management, Security Governance, Secure Software
Development

Goebel Consult, Landshut
http://www.goebel-consult.de

Blog:
https://www.goe-con.de/blog/dsl-fernkonfiguration-ist-kritisch-fur-den-datenschutz

Kolumne:
https://www.goe-con.de/hartmut-goebel/cissp-gefluester/2011-09-kommerz-uber-recht-fdp-die-gefaellt-mir-partei

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature