[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Windows port
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Windows port |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:43:22 -0500 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.3 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> What's missing
> ==============
> gcry, the SMTP transport and gnunet-testbed
Well, once libgcrypt is stable gcry should probably die anyway, so that's no
loss. gnunet-testbed is only for development / profiling / testing, so I
doubt Windoze-users will care. SMTP is so difficult to setup that hardly
anyone is using it, so again no loss. Great! :-).
> Questions
> =========
> - Non-stripped binaries are huge under Windows. The GNUnet
> executeables and libraries take 18 MB. Without debug-information
> they only take 1,6 MB.
> Would it be okay to make two separate prebuilt versions of GNUnet
> ("Debug" with and "Release" without debug information) available
> for download?
Sure. You know how to put up files on ovmj.org? If not, let me know off-list
and I'll help (and please don't mail me 18 MB of files :-).
> - I'd like to include third-party libraries licensed under LGPL or
> BSD-license in the Windows package. Would that be okay?
Certainly, code under any GPL-compatible license can be included (you may want
to check the specifics of the "BSD license", but I doubt that there'll be a
problem).
Christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFARI979tNtMeXQLkIRAjHUAJ9yjb4MsoMsShmW3cuLSHqAICB69gCfbPSD
uV6VIhmme6z1j/vck42CC2c=
=KW/E
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----