[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[GNUnet-developers] Re: [patch] BDB crash
From: |
N. Durner |
Subject: |
[GNUnet-developers] Re: [patch] BDB crash |
Date: |
Sat, 10 May 2003 13:07:52 +0100 |
> Was the patch supposed to be against v0.5.3 (which I applied it to) or
> a CVS version?
I diffed against the CVS. But if patch didn't complain, everthing went
fine...
> Also, I'll ask again in case you missed it the first time: Are you
> sure it's OK that it linked itself against libdb3 rather than libdb1
> or libdb2?
libdb3 is fine, I haven't tested GNUnet with libdb1 or libdb2... :-)
> I don't remember anyone saying which version it was written for.
I use 4, 3 should work, too.
> It could well be that all three have compatible APIs but that some
> implementation differences make (foo) OK in one version but not another.
As far as I know, the API changed a bit everytime a new major version was
released.
Please try the attached patch, it provides additional debug info (don't
forget "-L DEBUG").
Nils
bdbtest.diff
Description: Binary data
- [GNUnet-developers] [patch] BDB crash, N. Durner, 2003/05/08
- [GNUnet-developers] Re: [patch] BDB crash, Tom Barnes-Lawrence, 2003/05/08
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Re: [patch] BDB crash, N. Durner, 2003/05/09
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Re: [patch] BDB crash, Tom Barnes-Lawrence, 2003/05/09
- [GNUnet-developers] Re: [patch] BDB crash,
N. Durner <=
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Re: [patch] BDB crash, Tom Barnes-Lawrence, 2003/05/10
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Re: [patch] BDB crash, N. Durner, 2003/05/10
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Re: [patch] BDB crash, Tom Barnes-Lawrence, 2003/05/10
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Re: [patch] BDB crash, N. Durner, 2003/05/11
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Re: [patch] BDB crash, Tom Barnes-Lawrence, 2003/05/11
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Re: [patch] BDB crash, Tom Barnes-Lawrence, 2003/05/11
- [GNUnet-developers] Re: [patch] BDB crash, N. Durner, 2003/05/12