[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] followup evaluation
|
From: |
Gunnar Farneback |
|
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] followup evaluation |
|
Date: |
Sat, 23 Aug 2003 15:51:51 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (sparc-sun-solaris2.7) (with unibyte mode) |
Paul wrote:
> i propose to remove pattern `Sente12' because it does a subset
> of work done by ATTACK_THREAT move valuation in `value_moves.c'.
> there are some differences in the code and so removal of this
> pattern causes one fail in blunder:17. however, i think we
> should rather improve/fix the code in `value_moves.c' than
> keep two pieces of similar code.
Agreed. The valuation in blunder:17 doesn't seem to have an easy fix,
but it was passing rather luckily due to weaknesses in the
threaten_to_capture_helper() algorithm.
/Gunnar