[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Documentation File Formats
From: |
Jason Cater |
Subject: |
Re: Documentation File Formats |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Aug 2002 12:55:39 -0500 |
Well, when reading cbbrowne's DocBook url he provided, I see a Python
script that supposedly converts OpenOffice XML to DocBook. It's
OpenOffice, Docbook, and, PYTHON!!! :)
http://cbbrowne.com/info/sgmldtds.html
(notice the OOo2Dbk link at the bottom.)
Now, how cool is that?!?
-- Jason
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 17:49:12 +0100
Peter Sullivan <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:02:58AM -0700, J. Childers wrote:
> > Now that it's out, what do you guys think about standardizing
> > documentation in OpenOffice file formats?
>
> As regular readers of the Kernel Cousins (http://kt.zork.net/GNUe/)
> will be well aware, Docbook for GNUe documentation has been probably
> one of the most, erm, hotly-debated issues in IRC over the past year.
> Open Office has been seriously considered, especially since it should
> be theoretically possible (since Docbook is just another XML format)
> to get Open Office to save in Docbook format - although no-one seems
> too convinced about this.
>
> The last conversation IIRC was that someone noted that there was
> a seminar planned at Linux World Expo to talk about doing
> documentaton using open/free tools. Derek was going to attend
> this to see if we were the only project finding Docbook hard work,
> and/or if there were any decent "WYSIWYG" editors for Docbook we
> were not aware of. However, given the pressures on Derek's time
> at an event like this, I'm not sure what (if anything) happened on
> this?
>
> ("WYSIWYG" in quotes, as technically WYSIWYG for a non-visual
> format like Docbook is an oxymoron, but y'all know what I mean.)
>
> --
> Peter Sullivan <address@hidden>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnue mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnue