Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues

[Matthieu Moy]

Colin Walters <address@hidden> writes:

>> What does this mean for tla's merging capabilities?  Will users notice
>> that the logs suddenly went away?  
>
> They will certainly see a bunch of "D {arch}/blah" in the changesets if
> that's what you mean.

I think the problem Florian was refering is that "tla missing" on that
branch will  show you  patches that have  already been merged  in your
tree. This will also break the --skip-present option.

So,  as  you mentionned,  it's  OK for  dead  branches,  but would  be
problematic for an active branch.

-- 
Matthieu