Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

gnu-arch-users (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Wed Jun 30 2004 23:35:38 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• June 30, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Matthew Dempsky, 23:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Matthew Dempsky, 23:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Error in regexps.srparish.net mirror, Russell Steicke, 22:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Charles Duffy, 22:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Andrew Suffield, 22:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Pierce T.Wetter III, 22:10
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Miles Bader, 21:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Charles Duffy, 21:53
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Miles Bader, 21:50
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Miles Bader, 21:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Pierce T.Wetter III, 21:46
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Miles Bader, 21:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 21:29
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Miles Bader, 21:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 19:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Pierce T.Wetter III, 19:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 18:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 18:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Charles Duffy, 17:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Michael Poole, 17:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), James Blackwell, 17:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 17:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 17:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), James Blackwell, 17:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST], Bug Goo, 17:09
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST], Jeremy Shaw, 17:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Andrew Suffield, 17:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Aaron Bentley, 16:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 15:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 15:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Aaron Bentley, 15:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Error in regexps.srparish.net mirror, Tom Lord, 15:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 15:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 15:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 15:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Tom Lord, 15:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Andrew Suffield, 14:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 14:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 14:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Pierce T.Wetter III, 14:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 13:45
  • RE: [Gnu-arch-users] Dirname caching for leroy's tla on cygwin, Parker, Ron, 12:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why no '--no-greedy-add' option for build-config?, Tom Lord, 12:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), James Blackwell, 12:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Colin Walters, 11:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Dirname caching for leroy's tla on cygwin, John Meinel, 11:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Error in regexps.srparish.net mirror, Scott Parish, 11:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Aaron Bentley, 10:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Jani Monoses, 10:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), William Dode, 10:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Jan Hudec, 09:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Aaron Bentley, 09:34
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Error in regexps.srparish.net mirror, Russell Steicke, 09:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Jan Hudec, 09:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Matthew Palmer, 07:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Colin Walters, 06:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Marc Recht, 06:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), William Dode, 05:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Paul Hedderly, 05:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Colin Walters, 04:50
  • [Gnu-arch-users] oddness with .id file permissions, Miles Bader, 00:37
• June 29, 2004
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Why no '--no-greedy-add' option for build-config?, Haakon Riiser, 18:41
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Security hole in rssh, Aaron Bentley, 18:26
  • [Gnu-arch-users] PyArch patches, Aaron Bentley, 18:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 13:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), James Blackwell, 12:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Samuel Tardieu, 12:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 11:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request, Tom Lord, 11:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Charles Duffy, 08:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] corruption after cacherev (archive checksum mismatch), Matthieu MOY, 07:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), William Dode, 07:43
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Samuel Tardieu, 04:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tree shows no revisions in version, Ron Arts, 03:55
• June 28, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request, Robert Collins, 23:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 2 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 23:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 2 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 23:10
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [Hey tom!] file permissions and inode-sigs, Tom Lord, 22:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request, Tom Lord, 22:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 2 (and "what's tom up to"), Tez Kamihira, 20:29
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 2 (and "what's tom up to"), Andreas Rottmann, 18:32
  • [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 2 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 15:49
  • [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 15:48
  • [Gnu-arch-users] transient archives?, Jeremy Shaw, 15:37
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [Hey tom!] file permissions and inode-sigs, Aaron Bentley, 13:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request, Ben Burns, 13:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request, Ben Burns, 13:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Canonical wrapper?, Aaron Bentley, 12:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Canonical wrapper?, Jani Monoses, 11:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tree shows no revisions in version, Aaron Bentley, 10:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tree shows no revisions in version, Jan Hudec, 10:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] PyAarch considers valid names invalid, Aaron Bentley, 08:52
  • [Gnu-arch-users] PyAarch considers valid names invalid, Aaron Bentley, 08:47
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tree shows no revisions in version, Ron Arts, 07:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] corruption after cacherev (archive checksum mismatch), Gavin Baker, 06:59
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Dirname caching for leroy's tla on cygwin, John Meinel, 01:00
• June 27, 2004
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree builds, Miles Bader, 22:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request, Aaron Bentley, 20:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request, Ben Burns, 19:04
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] inventory needs a single-file mode, Andrew Suffield, 14:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (tla--devo--1.3--patch-28) fix for revlibs vs. NFS, Andrew Suffield, 13:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (tla--devo--1.3--patch-28) fix for revlibs vs. NFS, Andrew Suffield, 12:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Andrew Suffield, 12:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] version aliases, Aaron Bentley, 12:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (tla--devo--1.3--patch-28) fix for revlibs vs. NFS, Tom Lord, 12:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Tom Lord, 12:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Truly global =tagging-method?, Daniel Stone, 00:58
• June 26, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Canonical wrapper?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 17:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Truly global =tagging-method?, Jan Hudec, 15:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Truly global =tagging-method?, Matthieu Moy, 14:59
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Truly global =tagging-method?, Daniel Stone, 14:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Canonical wrapper? [was: Online book for usability], Jani Monoses, 14:21
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Canonical wrapper? [was: Online book for usability], Stephen J. Turnbull, 13:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] in-tree builds, Stephen J. Turnbull, 13:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, Aaron Bentley, 10:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Robert Collins, 08:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree builds, Jan Hudec, 06:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree builds, nadim, 05:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] (tla--devo--1.3--patch-28) fix for revlibs vs. NFS, Andrew Suffield, 04:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Andrew Suffield, 04:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Andrew Suffield, 04:28
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: in-tree builds, Andreas Rottmann, 03:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, Tom Lord, 00:53
• June 25, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Aaron Bentley, 23:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla devo configs, Robert Collins, 23:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, Aaron Bentley, 23:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, Miles Bader, 19:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Jani Monoses, 19:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Jason McCarty, 19:06
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla devo configs, Robert Anderson, 18:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, Robert Anderson, 18:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Jani Monoses, 18:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, Tom Lord, 18:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Tom Lord, 18:09
  • [Gnu-arch-users] (tla--devo--1.3--patch-28) fix for revlibs vs. NFS, Tom Lord, 18:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Juliusz Chroboczek, 18:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Juliusz Chroboczek, 17:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, James Blackwell, 17:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, James Blackwell, 17:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Jani Monoses, 17:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, Robert Anderson, 17:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, James Blackwell, 17:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, Tom Lord, 17:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, Aaron Bentley, 16:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, Aaron Bentley, 16:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] in-tree builds [was: Online book for usability], Juliusz Chroboczek, 16:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, James Blackwell, 16:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, Tom Lord, 16:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Juliusz Chroboczek, 16:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, Robert Anderson, 16:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, Aaron Bentley, 16:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, James Blackwell, 16:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, Aaron Bentley, 15:30
  • [Gnu-arch-users] inode signature problem plague, Robert Anderson, 15:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Tom Lord, 14:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] merging use-case, Tom Lord, 14:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Tom Lord, 14:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, James Blackwell, 13:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] java port, David Allouche, 12:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] PyArch patches, Aaron Bentley, 11:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Archive namespace usability, Aaron Bentley, 10:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] PyArch patches, David Allouche, 09:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, David Allouche, 09:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Archive namespace usability (was: Online book for usability), Matthew Palmer, 08:35
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Archive namespace usability (was: Online book for usability), David Allouche, 08:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Richard Curnow, 05:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] merging use-case, Jan Hudec, 04:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Matthew Palmer, 03:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] corruption after cacherev (archive checksum mismatch), Jean Helou, 03:20
• June 24, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] corruption after cacherev (archive checksum mismatch), Gavin Baker, 22:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request, Jason McCarty, 21:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] merging use-case, James Blackwell, 21:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Matthew Dempsky, 20:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] corruption after cacherev (archive checksum mismatch), Robert Collins, 19:55
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] corruption after cacherev (archive checksum mismatch), Gavin Baker, 19:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Robin Farine, 19:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 18:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, James Blackwell, 18:17
  • [Gnu-arch-users] merging use-case, Robert Anderson, 18:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request, Robert Anderson, 17:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Adrian Irving-Beer, 17:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request, Jason McCarty, 16:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Aaron Bentley, 16:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Pierce T . Wetter III, 16:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Juliusz Chroboczek, 15:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Tom Lord, 15:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request, Aaron Bentley, 14:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 14:31
  • [BUG] Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Mirror limit oddity, Tom Lord, 14:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request, John Meinel, 14:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request, Robert Anderson, 14:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request, Aaron Bentley, 13:54
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla undo feature request, Robert Anderson, 13:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, David Allouche, 11:21
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Mirror limit oddity, Aaron Bentley, 09:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Erik de Castro Lopo, 08:08
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Andreas Rottmann, 07:07
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 05:29
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 05:27
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 05:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 04:58
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 04:52
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 04:46
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 04:38
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Some issues, Miles Bader, 04:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 03:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tez Kamihira, 02:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ISSUE] (Round 3), GCC, pqm generalization, Tom Lord, 02:20
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 02:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ISSUE] (Round 3), GCC, pqm generalization, Andrew Suffield, 00:30
• June 23, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 23:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [ISSUE] (Round 3), GCC, pqm generalization, James Blackwell, 23:23
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [ISSUE] (Round 3), GCC, pqm generalization, Tom Lord, 22:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Matthew Dempsky, 21:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 21:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Matthew Dempsky, 21:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Stephen J. Turnbull, 21:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], James Blackwell, 19:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] java port, Robert Collins, 19:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] java port, James Blackwell, 19:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] newbie question re: precious files, autoconf/automake, Robin Farine, 17:53
  • [Gnu-arch-users] newbie question re: precious files, autoconf/automake, Ron Arts, 17:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Weird results of star-merge, Juliusz Chroboczek, 17:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Weird results of star-merge, Aaron Bentley, 17:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Weird results of star-merge, Juliusz Chroboczek, 16:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Weird results of star-merge, Aaron Bentley, 16:47
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Weird results of star-merge, Juliusz Chroboczek, 16:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Tom Lord, 16:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Andrew Suffield, 15:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 15:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 15:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 14:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Pierce T . Wetter III, 14:22
  • [Gnu-arch-users] round 2 of GCC v. Arch, Tom Lord, 14:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Andrew Suffield, 13:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 13:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Andrew Suffield, 13:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Charles Duffy, 12:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Andrew Suffield, 12:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 12:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Andrew Suffield, 12:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Andrew Suffield, 11:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Aaron Bentley, 11:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tobias C. Rittweiler, 11:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 11:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 11:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 11:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 10:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Q: publicly accessible archives?, Scott Parish, 08:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tobias C. Rittweiler, 08:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Charles Duffy, 07:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Andrew Suffield, 07:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Andrew Suffield, 07:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Charles Duffy, 07:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Jan Hudec, 03:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Jan Hudec, 03:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] java port, Jan Hudec, 02:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Aaron Bentley, 01:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 01:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] public apologia, Tom Lord, 01:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 01:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] java port, Tom Lord, 01:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] java port, James Blackwell, 01:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, James Blackwell, 01:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], James Blackwell, 00:57
• June 22, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Tom Lord, 23:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] public apologia, Matthew Dempsky, 23:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 23:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Tom Lord, 23:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 22:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Tom Lord, 22:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 22:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 22:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Andrew Suffield, 21:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 21:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Andrew Suffield, 21:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 20:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] java port, Andrew Suffield, 20:54
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why PQMs count, Tom Lord, 20:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] java port, Tom Lord, 20:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 19:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "The definitive treatise on merging in arch", Jeremy Shaw, 19:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "The definitive treatise on merging in arch", nadim, 18:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "The definitive treatise on merging in arch", Matthew Palmer, 18:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], James Blackwell, 16:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, James Blackwell, 16:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, James Blackwell, 16:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Adrian Irving-Beer, 14:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Frank T. Pohlmann, 14:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Robert Anderson, 14:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Andrew Suffield, 14:13
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Nikolai Weibull, 14:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Robert Anderson, 13:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] "The definitive treatise on merging in arch", Jeremy Shaw, 13:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Rob Kaper, 13:29
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Neil Stevens, 12:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Robin Farine, 11:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Charles Duffy, 11:45
  • [Gnu-arch-users] updated fedora rpm, Colin Walters, 11:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Colin Walters, 11:21
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Neil Stevens, 11:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Adrian Irving-Beer, 10:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Stephen J. Turnbull, 09:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] java port, Aaron Bentley, 08:44
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Nikolai Weibull, 08:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Andrew Suffield, 08:21
  • [Gnu-arch-users] "The definitive treatise on merging in arch", Matthew Palmer, 07:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] java port, Jan Hudec, 06:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] java port, Jan Hudec, 06:28
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why PQMs count, Stephen J. Turnbull, 06:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why PQMs count, Tom Lord, 06:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] java port, Peter Conrad, 06:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] java port, Cameron Patrick, 06:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Tom Lord, 05:57
  • [Gnu-arch-users] java port, David Bernard, 05:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Momchil Velikov, 05:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 05:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 05:27
  • [Gnu-arch-users] more about GCC address@hidden: Re: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 05:23
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why PQMs count, Florian Weimer, 05:21
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Neil Stevens, 05:16
  • [Gnu-arch-users] re: [OT] political action call, Tom Lord, 05:16
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Nikolai Weibull, 05:11
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] political action call, Neil Stevens, 04:57
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] political action call, Tom Lord, 04:47
  • Why PQMs count (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden:) Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 04:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Stephen J. Turnbull, 02:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Dustin Sallings, 02:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Tom Lord, 01:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Stephen J. Turnbull, 00:02
• June 21, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Stephen J. Turnbull, 22:58
  • [Gnu-arch-users] GCC v. Arch address@hidden: Regressions on mainline], Tom Lord, 22:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, James Blackwell, 18:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Tom Lord, 16:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] init-tree accepts no arguments, Bug Goo, 16:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Tom Lord, 16:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [bug] the gnu-arch-users mailing list archive mangles archive names, Jan Hudec, 10:00
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [bug] the gnu-arch-users mailing list archive mangles archive names, Aaron Bentley, 08:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Stephen J. Turnbull, 01:41
• June 20, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Tom Lord, 19:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] PyArch patches, Aaron Bentley, 18:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] more than one "my-id", Stefan Moch, 18:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] more than one "my-id", Johannes Berg, 17:19
  • [Gnu-arch-users] more than one "my-id", Stefan Moch, 16:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] init-tree accepts no arguments, Mike Hearn, 12:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] init-tree accepts no arguments, Aaron Bentley, 12:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] init-tree accepts no arguments, Johannes Berg, 12:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] init-tree accepts no arguments, Aaron Bentley, 12:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] init-tree accepts no arguments, Mike Hearn, 12:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] init-tree accepts no arguments, Aaron Bentley, 11:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] init-tree accepts no arguments, Aaron Bentley, 11:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Aaron Bentley, 10:08
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] init-tree accepts no arguments, Mike Hearn, 09:16
• June 19, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] PyArch patches, David Allouche, 18:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Andrew Suffield, 14:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] PyArch patches, John Meinel, 12:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] PyArch patches, David Allouche, 12:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Aaron Bentley, 11:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] PyArch patches, David Allouche, 11:06
• June 18, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] PyArch patches, Aaron Bentley, 21:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, Aaron Bentley, 20:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, TC, 20:12
  • [Gnu-arch-users] PyArch patches, Aaron Bentley, 19:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, David Allouche, 16:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, David Allouche, 16:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, James Blackwell, 10:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, Robert Widhopf-Fenk, 09:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, Stephen J. Turnbull, 04:24
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Online book for usability, James Blackwell, 02:40
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Online book for usability, James Blackwell, 02:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues (why no bdiff for Arch), James Blackwell, 00:29
• June 17, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, Miles Bader, 22:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Current tla --devo broken?, Aaron Bentley, 08:56
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Current tla --devo broken?, Charles Duffy, 08:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] a global-scale txnal distributed filesystem, Jan Hudec, 07:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] a global-scale txnal distributed filesystem, Stephen J. Turnbull, 07:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] a global-scale txnal distributed filesystem, Jan Hudec, 05:06
• June 16, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, Aaron Bentley, 23:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, Sri Ramkrishna, 23:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLAN: two stage commit, Bug Goo, 16:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Bug Goo, 14:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [bug] import revisions should have a distinctive header in their patchlogs, Bug Goo, 14:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Race condition in changes, Bug Goo, 14:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] The GNU project web page is not up to date, Bug Goo, 14:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] binary files, Bug Goo, 13:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed versions, Bug Goo, 13:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: commit --tagging, Bug Goo, 13:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: system branches, Bug Goo, 13:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] revisioning BDB databases, Bug Goo, 13:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] a global-scale txnal distributed filesystem, Andrew Suffield, 13:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] a global-scale txnal distributed filesystem, Bug Goo, 13:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla make-archive should display error message on stderr, Bug Goo, 13:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla commands outputing revision lists should be unified., Bug Goo, 13:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla revert-id, Bug Goo, 13:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Feature plans .... external references, Bug Goo, 13:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLAN -- library nicknames, Bug Goo, 13:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLAN -- library limits, Bug Goo, 13:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] a global-scale txnal distributed filesystem, Aaron Bentley, 12:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] a global-scale txnal distributed filesystem, Tom Lord, 12:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla cacherev should use pristines, Bug Goo, 12:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: version messages, Bug Goo, 12:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla delta should not put everything to stdout, Bug Goo, 12:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: submission branches, Bug Goo, 12:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] hooks invoked with wrong ARCH_REVISION set, Bug Goo, 12:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: bug goo meta-data, Bug Goo, 12:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Bug Goo, 12:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tag works too hard, Bug Goo, 12:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: summary revlibs, Bug Goo, 12:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] a global-scale txnal distributed filesystem, Tom Lord, 12:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] a global-scale txnal distributed filesystem, Andrew Suffield, 07:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] a global-scale txnal distributed filesystem, Harald Meland, 05:14
  • Re: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] tla delta should not put everything to stdout, Amit Shah, 04:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] binary files, Matthieu Moy, 03:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues (why no bdiff for Arch), Matthieu Moy, 03:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Binary diffs (Re: Some issues), Stephen J. Turnbull, 02:46
  • [Gnu-arch-users] public apologia, Tom Lord, 00:33
• June 15, 2004
  • (hey Andrew) Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] tla delta should not put everything to stdout, Tom Lord, 23:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] tla delta should not put everything to stdout, Tom Lord, 23:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 23:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OpenBSD] Official port of tla-1.2, Tom Lord, 22:59
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] revisioning BDB databases, Tom Lord, 22:54
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] a global-scale txnal distributed filesystem, Tom Lord, 22:48
  • [Gnu-arch-users] a global-scale txnal distributed filesystem, Tom Lord, 22:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, Miles Bader, 22:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 21:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Tom Lord, 21:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, Juliusz Chroboczek, 20:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 19:53
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] binary files, Tom Lord, 19:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed versions, Tom Lord, 19:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, Aaron Bentley, 18:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 18:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, Robert Anderson, 17:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, Aaron Bentley, 17:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, Juliusz Chroboczek, 17:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 16:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 16:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 16:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 16:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 16:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues (why no bdiff for Arch), James Blackwell, 14:54
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, Stig Brautaset, 12:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Colin Walters, 12:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, Aaron Bentley, 10:51
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: How to 'update' an updated archive?, TC, 09:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Aaron Bentley, 09:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 03:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 02:25
• June 14, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 23:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 23:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Michael Poole, 23:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 23:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 23:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 22:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 22:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Tom Lord, 22:35
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Message translation - basic framework, Tez Kamihira, 21:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extracting a standard diff, Miles Bader, 19:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed versions, Aaron Bentley, 17:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Thoughts on VU, Tom Lord, 16:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed versions, Tom Lord, 16:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed versions, Tom Lord, 15:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Tom Lord, 14:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Charles Duffy, 12:36
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Binary diffs (Re: Some issues), Lőrentey Károly, 11:41
  • [Gnu-arch-users] basic tla support in meld, Markus Becker, 08:47
  • RE: [Gnu-arch-users] Extracting a standard diff, Johannes Berg, 08:02
  • RE: [Gnu-arch-users] Extracting a standard diff, Jacob Gorm Hansen, 07:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extracting a standard diff, Jan Hudec, 07:25
  • RE: [Gnu-arch-users] Extracting a standard diff, Jacob Gorm Hansen, 07:18
• June 13, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Recover a deleted file, Tom Lord, 21:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 21:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Tom Lord, 21:16
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] tla delta should not put everything to stdout, Miles Bader, 19:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extracting a standard diff, Miles Bader, 18:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Extracting a standard diff, James Blackwell, 15:38
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Extracting a standard diff, Jacob Gorm Hansen, 14:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cached rev support in pyarch, Robert Collins, 08:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Message translation, Jan Hudec, 03:52
• June 12, 2004
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] having $ARCH_TREE_ROOT set makes sense for all hooks, Stig Brautaset, 16:57
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Recover a deleted file, Daniel James, 16:21
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] having $ARCH_TREE_ROOT set makes sense for all hooks, Stig Brautaset, 15:22
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] hooks invoked with wrong ARCH_REVISION set, Stig Brautaset, 15:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cached rev support in pyarch, Aaron Bentley, 11:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cached rev support in pyarch, David Allouche, 09:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Binary diffs (Re: Some issues), Stephen J. Turnbull, 01:47
• June 11, 2004
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Message translation, Tez Kamihira, 23:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla abrowse, rbrowse don't act on current repository, Miles Bader, 18:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla abrowse, rbrowse don't act on current repository, Colin Walters, 17:53
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Binary diffs (Re: Some issues), Lőrentey Károly, 17:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed versions, Aaron Bentley, 12:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cached rev support in pyarch, Aaron Bentley, 11:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cached rev support in pyarch, David Allouche, 10:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla abrowse, rbrowse don't act on current repository, Miles Bader, 10:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cached rev support in pyarch, Aaron Bentley, 09:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla delta should not put everything to stdout, Jani Monoses, 09:20
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla abrowse, rbrowse don't act on current repository, Amit Shah, 09:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla delta should not put everything to stdout, Aaron Bentley, 08:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed versions, David Allouche, 05:58
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] tla delta should not put everything to stdout, Amit Shah, 05:45
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cached rev support in pyarch, Robert Collins, 05:29
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] tla delta should not put everything to stdout, Miles Bader, 05:19
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] tla delta should not put everything to stdout, Amit Shah, 05:09
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] tla delta should not put everything to stdout, Miles Bader, 04:57
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cached rev support in pyarch, David Allouche, 04:55
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] tla delta should not put everything to stdout, Amit Shah, 04:53
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] tla delta should not put everything to stdout, Miles Bader, 04:46
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla delta should not put everything to stdout, Amit Shah, 04:35
• June 10, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, James Blackwell, 18:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, James Blackwell, 17:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, William Dode, 15:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 14:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, James Blackwell, 14:11
  • [Gnu-arch-users] missing patches which touch file X, Robert Anderson, 14:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OpenBSD] Official port of tla-1.2, Aaron Bentley, 12:56
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [OpenBSD] Official port of tla-1.2, Laurent Cheylus, 12:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 08:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Ollivier Robert, 05:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Stephen J. Turnbull, 05:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Stephen J. Turnbull, 05:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: allow write for others?, Charles Duffy, 04:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: allow write for others?, Nico Schottelius, 04:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 02:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Jani Monoses, 02:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 01:53
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: allow write for others?, Miles Bader, 01:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] allow write for others?, Nico Schottelius, 01:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] Make "apply-changeset" command default to current-directory, Bug Goo, 01:10
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] Make "apply-changeset" command default to current-directory, Miles Bader, 01:10
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla update edge case, Miles Bader, 01:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla update edge case, Aaron Bentley, 00:29
• June 09, 2004
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla update edge case, Miles Bader, 23:34
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla update edge case, Aaron Bentley, 23:22
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla update edge case, Miles Bader, 23:11
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla update edge case, Aaron Bentley, 22:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Aaron Bentley, 22:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Colin Walters, 21:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthew Palmer, 21:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Some issues, Miles Bader, 20:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Miles Bader, 20:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Some issues, James Blackwell, 20:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, James Blackwell, 20:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, James Blackwell, 20:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Jamie Wilkinson, 19:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] allow write for others?, Michael Poole, 19:23
  • [Gnu-arch-users] allow write for others?, Nico Schottelius, 19:09
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Some issues, Neil Stevens, 18:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Some issues, Miles Bader, 18:27
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Some issues, Neil Stevens, 18:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Some issues, Miles Bader, 18:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Eduardo Pérez Ureta, 18:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Miles Bader, 18:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 18:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Miles Bader, 18:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 18:00
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Some issues, Neil Stevens, 17:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Miles Bader, 17:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 17:43
  • Re: synchronicity (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues), Sriram Ramkrishna, 17:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 17:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Sriram Ramkrishna, 17:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 17:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 17:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 17:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Eduardo Pérez Ureta, 17:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Miles Bader, 17:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 17:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 17:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Colin Walters, 16:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 16:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 15:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 15:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 15:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Colin Walters, 15:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Thomas Bleher, 15:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 15:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 14:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Michael Poole, 14:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 14:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 14:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Colin Walters, 14:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 14:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 14:21
  • synchronicity (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues), Matthieu Moy, 14:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 14:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 14:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 14:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 14:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 13:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 13:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Sriram Ramkrishna, 13:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 13:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Milan Cvetkovic, 13:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 13:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 13:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 13:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 13:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 13:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 13:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 13:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Milan Cvetkovic, 13:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 13:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 13:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Charles Duffy, 13:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 12:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 12:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Aaron Bentley, 12:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 12:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 12:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 12:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 12:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 12:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 12:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Cameron Patrick, 12:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 12:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 12:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 12:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 12:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Cameron Patrick, 12:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Milan Cvetkovic, 12:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 12:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Cameron Patrick, 12:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 12:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 12:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 12:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 12:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 12:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 12:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 12:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Charles Duffy, 12:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Charles Duffy, 12:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Aaron Bentley, 12:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 12:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 12:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 12:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 11:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 11:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Cameron Patrick, 11:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 11:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Jan-Benedict Glaw, 11:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Colin Walters, 11:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Milan Cvetkovic, 11:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Aaron Bentley, 11:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 11:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Cameron Patrick, 11:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, mdpoole, 11:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Andrew Suffield, 11:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Matthieu Moy, 11:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Michael Poole, 11:05
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Some issues, Florian Weimer, 10:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed versions, Aaron Bentley, 09:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed versions, David Allouche, 06:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla looks for a "^Y" file in tla file-find (and crashes !), Matthieu Moy, 05:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla looks for a "^Y" file in tla file-find (and crashes !), Jani Monoses, 05:35
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla looks for a "^Y" file in tla file-find (and crashes !), Matthieu Moy, 05:09
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Thoughts on VU, Matthew Dempsky, 00:22
• June 08, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Recover a deleted file, Aaron Bentley, 17:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Recover a deleted file, Miles Bader, 17:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Completely distributed development, Matthieu Moy, 15:46
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Fix merge commands to behave sanely for mixed versions, Aaron Bentley, 14:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- merge request headers, Colin Walters, 10:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Aaron Bentley, 10:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fixing a log message post hoc, David Allouche, 10:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Recover a deleted file, Aaron Bentley, 09:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Completely distributed development, David Allouche, 09:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, David Allouche, 08:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Recover a deleted file, Juliusz Chroboczek, 08:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Andrew Suffield, 08:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge, David Allouche, 08:23
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- merge request headers, Julian T. J. Midgley, 07:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] Rename "file-diffs" command to "file-diff" (with compat alias), Bug Goo, 05:21
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] Rename "file-diffs" command to "file-diff" (with compat alias), Miles Bader, 05:20
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 04:37
  • [Gnu-arch-users] hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 04:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Stephen J. Turnbull, 02:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fixing a log message post hoc, James Blackwell, 00:42
• June 07, 2004
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Recover a deleted file, Miles Bader, 21:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Andrew Suffield, 21:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Tom Lord, 20:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Tom Lord, 20:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Tez Kamihira, 20:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Tom Lord, 18:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Yannick Gingras, 18:11
  • [Gnu-arch-users] "Server"-side commit hooks, Andrew Suffield, 17:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Recover a deleted file, Andrew Suffield, 17:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Andrew Suffield, 17:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Recover a deleted file, Andrew Suffield, 16:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Matthieu Moy, 16:39
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLAN: two stage commit, Tom Lord, 16:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Aaron Bentley, 16:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Aaron Bentley, 16:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Tom Lord, 15:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Recover a deleted file, Cameron Patrick, 15:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Recover a deleted file, Matthieu Moy, 15:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Recover a deleted file, Andrew Suffield, 15:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Recover a deleted file, Juliusz Chroboczek, 14:59
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Recover a deleted file, Andrzej Wąsowski, 14:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Tom Lord, 14:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Tom Lord, 13:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] corrupt archive, Aaron Bentley, 12:34
  • [Gnu-arch-users] corrupt archive, Jani Monoses, 11:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: microbranches: prism-merge vs multi-merge, Aaron Bentley, 11:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fixing a log message post hoc, Charles Duffy, 10:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fixing a log message post hoc, Juliusz Chroboczek, 10:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fixing a log message post hoc, Aaron Bentley, 10:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fixing a log message post hoc, Juliusz Chroboczek, 10:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- Selected inventory, Jason McCarty, 09:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Tez Kamihira, 07:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Stephen J. Turnbull, 05:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Patch Logs vs. character sets, Stephen J. Turnbull, 05:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- Selected inventory, Stefan Monnier, 04:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Jan Hudec, 03:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Jan Hudec, 03:06
• June 06, 2004
  • [Gnu-arch-users] scheduled downtime for regexps.srparish.net: wed morning (2004-06-09), Scott Parish, 23:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fixing a log message post hoc, Colin Walters, 23:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Tez Kamihira, 22:53
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Translation of tla, Yannick Gingras, 21:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Jan Hudec, 18:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Aaron Bentley, 16:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Tom Lord, 16:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Tom Lord, 15:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Tom Lord, 15:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Tom Lord, 15:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Jan Hudec, 09:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] changeset translation preparatory work, Jamie Wilkinson, 07:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fixing a log message post hoc, James Blackwell, 01:43
• June 05, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] changeset translation preparatory work, Miles Bader, 21:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- Selected inventory, Aaron Bentley, 21:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- Selected inventory, Jason McCarty, 20:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] changeset translation preparatory work, Aaron Bentley, 20:37
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Fixing a log message post hoc, Juliusz Chroboczek, 20:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- Selected inventory, Aaron Bentley, 19:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- Selected inventory, Miles Bader, 19:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- Selected inventory, Jason McCarty, 19:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Juliusz Chroboczek, 18:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- Selected inventory, Aaron Bentley, 18:52
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG: 103] fixed in address@hidden, Colin Walters, 14:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLAN -- library nicknames, Aaron Bentley, 11:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- Selected inventory, Stefan, 11:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- Selected inventory, Stefan, 11:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Completely distributed development, Matthieu Moy, 06:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Completely distributed development, Robert Collins, 01:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- Selected inventory, Jason McCarty, 01:03
• June 04, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- Selected inventory, Aaron Bentley, 22:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Robin Farine, 21:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- Selected inventory, Stefan, 19:59
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla commands outputing revision lists should be unified., Matthieu Moy, 19:18
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Completely distributed development, Matthieu Moy, 18:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Jan Hudec, 18:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Jan Hudec, 18:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] GCC's version control requirements, Andrew Suffield, 17:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Andrew Suffield, 17:14
  • [Gnu-arch-users] GCC's version control requirements, Karel Gardas, 17:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Andrew Suffield, 17:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Improved zsh completion for tla available, Jason McCarty, 17:09
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLAN -- library limits, Tom Lord, 16:45
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] FEATURE PLAN -- library nicknames, Tom Lord, 16:43
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Robin Farine, 16:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Sylvain Defresne, 15:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Patch Logs vs. character sets, Tom Lord, 15:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Jan Hudec, 14:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Tom Lord, 13:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Andrew Suffield, 10:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Andrew Suffield, 10:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] changeset translation preparatory work, Colin Walters, 10:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] changeset translation preparatory work, William Dode, 10:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] changeset translation preparatory work, Colin Walters, 09:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Juliusz Chroboczek, 09:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Improved zsh completion for tla available, Jan Hudec, 09:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Jan Hudec, 08:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Jan Hudec, 08:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Juliusz Chroboczek, 08:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Andrew Suffield, 08:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Jan Hudec, 06:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Andrew Suffield, 06:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Jan Hudec, 05:32
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Improved zsh completion for tla available, Jason McCarty, 04:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] changeset translation preparatory work, Tom Lord, 02:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] feature plan -- Selected inventory, Tom Lord, 01:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] changeset translation preparatory work, Tom Lord, 01:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: unifying =tagging-method and .arch-inventory, Colin Walters, 00:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] recursive per-directory tagging regexps, Colin Walters, 00:57
• June 03, 2004
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] recursive per-directory tagging regexps, Robert Collins, 23:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [MERGE REQUEST] recursive per-directory tagging regexps, Colin Walters, 22:41
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla make-archive should display error message on stderr, Matthieu Moy, 20:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Andrew Suffield, 18:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Cachrevs in mirrors.sourcecontrol.net, Miles Bader, 18:26
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: revlib locking, Julian T. J. Midgley, 16:12
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Cachrevs in mirrors.sourcecontrol.net, Stefan Monnier, 11:41
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [BUG] FEATURE PLANS: "perfect" summary deltas, Aaron Bentley, 09:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] french mailing-list ?, William Dode, 08:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Cachrevs in mirrors.sourcecontrol.net, Colin Walters, 08:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] PyArch newbie observations/questions, Aaron Bentley, 08:09
• June 02, 2004
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Cachrevs in mirrors.sourcecontrol.net, John F Meinel Jr, 22:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] french mailing-list ?, William Dode, 12:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Thread tracking for bugs, Andrew Suffield, 11:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch logs not rfc(2)822 compatible, David Allouche, 11:45
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Thread tracking for bugs, Julian T. J. Midgley, 11:25
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Bikesheds, Matthew Dempsky, 10:58
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Bikesheds, Neil Stevens, 09:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Bikesheds, Aaron Bentley, 09:22
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Bikesheds, Matthew Dempsky, 09:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] botched invariant: creating a remote mirror, Aaron Bentley, 09:09
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: mirroring local archives remotely, Amit Shah, 03:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] mirroring local archives remotely, Cameron Patrick, 03:34
  • [Gnu-arch-users] mirroring local archives remotely, Amit Shah, 03:30
  • [Gnu-arch-users] botched invariant: creating a remote mirror, Amit Shah, 03:03
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] ping tomlord, Matthew Dempsky, 01:35
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: =partner-versions, Miles Bader, 00:03
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: =partner-versions, Mikhael Goikhman, 00:02
• June 01, 2004
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: =partner-versions, Stefan Monnier, 23:35
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: =partner-versions, Miles Bader, 22:12
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] tla cacherev should use pristines, Robin Green, 20:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch logs not rfc(2)822 compatible, Jeremy Shaw, 19:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] =partner-versions, Mikhael Goikhman, 18:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch logs not rfc(2)822 compatible, Miles Bader, 17:51
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Congrats on the OSI award!, Matthew Dempsky, 16:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Congrats on the OSI award!, William Dode, 16:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch logs not rfc(2)822 compatible, Andrew Suffield, 15:03
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [MERGE REQUEST] changeset translation preparatory work, Stefan Monnier, 14:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: patch logs not rfc(2)822 compatible, Jeremy Shaw, 14:43
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: =partner-versions, Stefan Monnier, 14:40
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Congrats on the OSI award!, Matthew Dempsky, 13:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] =partner-versions, Aaron Bentley, 12:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [MERGE REQUEST] changeset translation preparatory work, Stephen J. Turnbull, 12:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] =partner-versions, Aaron Bentley, 07:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] =partner-versions, Mikhael Goikhman, 07:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] unifying =tagging-method and .arch-inventory, Andrew Suffield, 05:38
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Bikesheds, Neil Stevens, 05:30
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] The GNU project web page is not up to date, Matthieu Moy, 01:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: =partner-versions, Matthieu Moy, 01:47
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: unifying =tagging-method and .arch-inventory, Stefan Monnier, 00:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: weird problem using tla get on particular machine, Rob Weir, 00:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: unifying =tagging-method and .arch-inventory, Colin Walters, 00:19
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: unifying =tagging-method and .arch-inventory, Stefan Monnier, 00:09

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc