[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] ccache support patch for the Builder
From: |
Dmitry Samoyloff |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnewsense-dev] ccache support patch for the Builder |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:24:22 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.1 (Bad Medicine-pre) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
At Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:00:46 +0200,
Sam Geeraerts wrote:
>
> Dmitry Samoyloff schreef:
> > Hello,
> >
> > As far, as I've rebuilt new Gnash in the Builder several times already,
> > ccache
> > is certainly of help for me. Attached is a small 2-line patch for the
> > Builder
> > to support ccache.
>
> Intersting idea. I have little experience with ccache. It's only useful
> from the second time on a package is compiled, right?
Yes.
> Builder normally
> compiles a package only once. I'm curious to know what the ccache
> penalty is. If it makes Builder run a lot longer I'd rather not include
> it by default.
http://ccache.samba.org/performance.html
Well, at least we could make it an option in config.local, right?
> I guess ccache only works when the binaries are not removed between
> compiles. Builder removes $WORKINGDIR every time before building a
> package. Can you explain how ccache can do its thing then?
It stores all info in its own cache (say, ~/.ccache/), thus it is OK to remove
a build directory. My do-update time for Gnash decreased from half an hour to
several minutes with ccache.
--
I'm an FSF member -- Help us support software freedom!
<http://www.fsf.org/jf?referrer=7253>