[Gnewsense-dev] Re: Important bug reports (GNU documentation missing)

[christophe . jarry]

Quoting Richard Stallman <address@hidden>:

>     For my 'gnu-doc' package, I plan to use the 'bfd.info' file released
>     in gdb-7.1 source code, which is more recent than binutils-2.20.1 one.
>     Do you think it is a problem to include latest versions of GNU
>     documentation in 'gnu-doc' package, while GNU software available in
>     gNewSense metad is older?
>
> It would be better to use the manuals that correspond to the programs
> in gNewSense.
>
> It would be nice to update gNewSense based on the latest versions,
> but if that isn't done, it is best to use the older versions' manuals.
Then, I will package documentation corresponding to programs shipped  
with current gNewSense metad version. If gNewSense updates its GNU  
packages later, I will update the 'gnu-doc' package version and  
content accordingly.

Christophe

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.