Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Status of Document "About gNewSense"

[Luis Felipe Lopez Acevedo]

El lun, 17-08-2009 a las 20:18 +0200, Zach Oglesby escribió:
> Quoting Luis Felipe Lopez Acevedo <address@hidden>:
> 
> > El dom, 16-08-2009 a las 21:27 +0200, Zach Oglesby escribió:
> >> Quoting Luis Felipe Lopez Acevedo <address@hidden>:
> >>
> >> > Following is the current status of this project[1]:
> >> >
> >> > 1. Open the project for the document (Done)
> >> > 2. Propose the structure (In progress)
> >> > 3. Define the final structure
> >> > 4. Propose the content
> >> > 5. Write a draft
> >> > 6. Revise and improve
> >> > 7. Convert the final document to DocBook if necessary
> >> > 8. Commit it to gNewSense in Savannah
> >> >
> >> > I think we can start to submit proposals for the structure of this
> >> > document.
> >> >
> >> > I already put my proposal in the page of the project.
> >> >
> >> > 1. http://wiki.gnewsense.org/DocumentationProjects/AboutgNewSense
> >>
> >> I already made a note on the wiki, but this looks good to me, I think
> >> we should actually work out of the repo and not the wiki so we can
> >> keep the formatting easier (plus I would rather use emacs, the a
> >> browser).
> >>
> >> Also an additional step would be get it packaged and added to gNS. Its
> >> no good it we write and it never makes it into the OS.
> >>
> >
> > Ok, then I'd change the steps for this project in particular to:
> >
> > 1. Open the project (Done)
> > 2. Make directory for the project in the repository
> > 3. Define the structure in DocBook (In progress)
> > 4. Write a draft
> > 5. Revise and improve
> > 6. Package final document and add it to gNS
> >
> > For steps 3 to 5 we commit changes directly to the repository.
> >
> > If you think this steps are ok I will change the Task list in the
> > project page to reflect this changes.
> >
> 
> So I am trying to push this to bzr but I am having no luck.
> 'bzr push  
> sftp://address@hidden/srv/bzr/gnewsense/about-gnewsense'
> 
> Can anyone help me with this?
> 

Zach, wouldn't it be better to put all documents in a directory called
"documentation"?