[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnash-dev] Testing API (was: ExternalInterface tests)
From: |
strk |
Subject: |
[Gnash-dev] Testing API (was: ExternalInterface tests) |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:58:41 +0200 |
On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 07:16:46AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote:
> On 06/04/10 07:01, strk wrote:
> > Rob, any reason not to use the check_equals() macro ?
>
> Yes, I dislike the check API, and prefer the DejaGnu one.
> We really should use one testing API, but as both work,
> I see no reason to enforce one or the other.
Could you please say more about what you don't like about
the check API ? I said what I like about it. Will repeat it:
the 'check' API reports both success/failure both
expected/obtained results in case of failure.
In the specific case detected by Ben, if we were using check_equals
we would see as part of the failure message the results obtained with
the proprietary player, which should become what we expect.
--strk;
() Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
/\ http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
- [Gnash-dev] ExternalInterface tests, Benjamin Wolsey, 2010/06/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] ExternalInterface tests, strk, 2010/06/04
- [Gnash-dev] Testing API (was: ExternalInterface tests),
strk <=
- [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API, Rob Savoye, 2010/06/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API, strk, 2010/06/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API, Rob Savoye, 2010/06/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API, Benjamin Wolsey, 2010/06/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API, Rob Savoye, 2010/06/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API, Benjamin Wolsey, 2010/06/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: Testing API, strk, 2010/06/04