[Gnash-dev] Re: Gnash-dev Digest, Vol 36, Issue 6

[Guofan Wang]

Our gnash swf player is very very slow, there are very much room to
optimize in the code.
I think we should remove boost library.

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:00 AM,  <address@hidden> wrote:
> Send Gnash-dev mailing list submissions to
>        address@hidden
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        address@hidden
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        address@hidden
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Gnash-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. TeddyMark, a flash framerate benchmark (John Gilmore)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:21:04 -0800
> From: John Gilmore <address@hidden>
> Subject: [Gnash-dev] TeddyMark, a flash framerate benchmark
> To: address@hidden
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
>
> FYI, adobe runs faster or slower in various browsers, on the same
> hardware and OS.  This must mean there's room to optimize in the
> flash/browser interface code.  I don't know whether ours is fast or
> slow.
>
>        John
>
> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 07:06:35 +0800
> From: "Carlos Nazareno" <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: GNOME vs XFCE + TeddyMark
>
>>> If both browsers were using the same SWF plugin, then this is extremely
>>> remarkable, and merits investigation.
>
> Whoops! I forgot! Flash *does* perform differently under different browsers.
>
> In terms of Flash 9 framerates in WinXP,
> FireFox 2.x < Opera 9.x < IE 6
>
> With my current rig:
> Flash 10 TeddyMark Framerate
> IE 7 < Opera 9.63 < Safari 3.2 < Firefox 3.05
> (Safari & Firefox are very close with about 3 fps difference)
>
> Ever since Firefox 3 was released, Flash has performed better on it
> than in Opera. (if I remember correctly, same results under Ubuntu
> Hardy).
>
> If Browse is based on Firefox as people say (I thought it was
> XULRunner? -> same engine that Firefox uses, but is not Firefox), then
> this makes things even worse in the case of Browse because Adobe Flash
> in Firefox 3 normally runs even faster than in Opera 9.x.
>
> Anyway, I think it's the upscaling/zooming in that's causing Browse's
> poor Flash (and everything else's!) performance in comparison to
> Opera.
>
> Again, it would be real cool if you guys would run the benchmark just
> so we can see tangible CPU performance numbers :)
>
> TeddyMark for XO (reduced # of Teddies from 200 to 16!) can be run from:
>
> http://www.phlashers.com/lab/teddymark/index.html
>
> I'll make sourcefiles and sourcecode hopefully available over the
> weekend, but I gotta get back to work 1st then get some sleep.
>
> The .swf you can rip directly from this URL:
> http://www.phlashers.com/lab/teddymark/teddyMarkAS2_16.swf
> of you want to run it on Gnash in standalone mode. I wouldn't
> recommend doing that thos as fullscreen Flash for a CPU-heavy app
> would be a framerate killer.
>
> Nyt all!
>
> - -Naz
>
> - --
> Carlos Nazareno
> http://www.object404.com
> - --
> interactive media specialist
> zen graffiti studios
> http://www.zengraffiti.com
> - --
> Philippine Flash ActionScripters
> http://www.phlashers.com
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
>
> ------- End of Forwarded Message
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnash-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
>
>
> End of Gnash-dev Digest, Vol 36, Issue 6
> ****************************************
>