[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: About AMF (Techical)
From: |
Jason Woofenden |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: About AMF (Techical) |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Sep 2008 17:34:36 -0400 |
> While you say I'm ignoring your technical issue, I see you totally ignoring
> the bigger picture of what RTMP needs to work, and not being very open
> minded about those issues. Somewhere in the middle is probably a perfect
> solution. :-)
What's the bigger picture of what RTMP needs to work?
Here's what I've learned from your recent e-mails about this:
1) AMF encoding/decoding
2) convenient methods for accessing large/complex objects that
are/were encoded/decoded to/from AMF
3) storing some of these complex objects
What else is there?
Oh, and another question: do any of these large/complex objects have
types that cannot be represented by as_object/as_value?
You mentioned NetConnection, which I know is already written (though I
don't know of code to serialize it.)
Thanks, - Jason
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: About AMF (Techical), strk, 2008/09/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: About AMF (Techical), Rob Savoye, 2008/09/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: About AMF (Techical), strk, 2008/09/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: About AMF (Techical), Rob Savoye, 2008/09/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: About AMF (Techical), strk, 2008/09/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: About AMF (Techical), Rob Savoye, 2008/09/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: About AMF (Techical), Russ Nelson, 2008/09/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: About AMF (Techical), Rob Savoye, 2008/09/04