[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: About AMF (Techical)
From: |
strk |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: About AMF (Techical) |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:21:00 +0200 |
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 12:40:33PM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote:
> If you
> seriously intend to completely ignore libamf, then you'd better fix the
> RTMP support, all the testcases, and the utilities to use readAMF0.
About testcases: self-contained ones would be far superior then internal
ones. One example is the recent Matrix-related test.
We have NO self-contained testcase failing, still an internal case was
failing due to misinterpretation of the requirements (the Flash model).
In this reguard, about AMF the only self-contained tests we have are:
- actionscript.all/SharedObject.as (SOL)
- misc-ming.all/NetStream-SquareTest.c (FLV)
A task I'd like to undertake is using the SharedObject.as to test
circular-references, which may prove on-the-road the appropriateness
of Element vs buffer based approaches.
But it is also important to implement a framework for testing other
uses and to improve the existing ones (FLV for instance could contain
lots more meta tags for us to test).
Testcases needing new frameworks:
- Remoting (needs a simple server running during make check)
- RTMP (needs a simple server running during make check)
Testcases needing more attention:
- actionscript.all/LocalConnection.as
-> currently fails
--strk;