Re: [Gnash-dev] remoting

[Rob Savoye]

strk wrote:
> Agreed. It's just the "replace" idea I'm against.
> Adding RTMP is good.
> Best if keeping the IOChannel abstraction for final use.

  Ideally, yes. Abstractions like that are usually good, although 
IOChannel may need to evolve some to support the 64 I/O channels used in 
a single RTMP connection, plus to handle sending Camera and Microphone 
AMF objects to a server.

  Replacing any package always has a bit of uncertainty, but I'm not 
worried about it. I've got some thoughts on adding support for testing 
networking, more than what I do now, which is mostly just testing 
encoding and decoding of packets.

        - rob -