[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] install vs install-plugins && klash
From: |
strk |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] install vs install-plugins && klash |
Date: |
Sun, 18 May 2008 18:14:44 +0200 |
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 06:01:01PM +0200, Rob Savoye wrote:
> strk wrote:
>
> >Fine by me. Might as well drop the custom 'install-plugin' rule
> >(maybe keeping as alias) so to avoid non-standard rules in Makefile.ams
>
> I'd probably keep install-plugins, as sometimes for developers it's
> easier. Course cd'ing into plugin and typing make install is probably
> even better. :-)
>
> So I assume this means you agree that "make install" should also
> install the plugins ?
Yes, for the short term.
For the long term, since I don't agree on the default install dir,
I'd require a specific ./configure switch to enable install of the plugins
(ie: no default, only installed if you pick an install among prefix|system|user)
--strk;
- [Gnash-dev] install vs install-plugins && klash, Russ Nelson, 2008/05/17
- Re: [Gnash-dev] install vs install-plugins && klash, Rob Savoye, 2008/05/18
- Re: [Gnash-dev] install vs install-plugins && klash, strk, 2008/05/18
- Re: [Gnash-dev] install vs install-plugins && klash, Rob Savoye, 2008/05/18
- Re: [Gnash-dev] install vs install-plugins && klash, strk, 2008/05/18
- Re: [Gnash-dev] install vs install-plugins && klash, Rob Savoye, 2008/05/18
- Re: [Gnash-dev] install vs install-plugins && klash,
strk <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] install vs install-plugins && klash, Rob Savoye, 2008/05/18
- Re: [Gnash-dev] install vs install-plugins && klash, strk, 2008/05/18
- Re: [Gnash-dev] install vs install-plugins && klash, Rob Savoye, 2008/05/18