Re: [Gnash-dev] ACT module; white box testing and aspect templates

[Eric Hughes]

At 08:05 AM 7/18/2007, strk wrote:
> I see you throw std::exception() rather then a subclass, but the
> standard C++ lib (at least the gnu one) doesnt' provide a constructor
> for that base class taking a string or char *.
> Do you have an exception specification already ?
> Or should we use the derived runtime_exception ?

It matters little to me at this point.

The only place where I'm going to really care is in the scheduler.  That's 
the moral equivalent of the top-level function of a thread body, and is 
responsible for task management.  There will need to be a catch-all handler 
there anyway.

Eric