Re: [Gnash-commit] [SCM] Gnash branch, master, updated. release_0_8_9_start-66-g17d5a9b

[Gabriele Giacone]

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 2:58 PM, strk <address@hidden> wrote:
> I don't understand the rationale for preferring one over the other.
>
> I think the original patch was meant to fix a case in which gnash
> was blinldy pointing  at lib/kde4, where such directory didn't exist.
>
> No, I don't think the original patch was good either, as rather
> than checking for existance of lib/kde4 it introduced checking for
> existance of lib64/kde4, and used that, if present.
>
> What the code is still missing is a check for the directory that
> will finally be used. It is done for lib64/kde4 but _not_ for lib/kde4.

Directory existence check is there just because on Fedora, if lib64/
is present then it has to be used.
Otherwise checking existence is useless given install creates them
whatever they are I guess.

--
Gabriele, neither fedora nor kde user.