[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[gfsd] Re: iozone license free or non-free
From: |
Iozone |
Subject: |
[gfsd] Re: iozone license free or non-free |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:51:39 -0500 |
Richard,
I sent email on to Norcott to see if we can arrange a
conference call so we can get together and discuss
the topic. He is the original author of the license (16 years
ago) and will need to be involved in any modifications.
I'll contact you as soon as I hear back from William.
In the meantime, you may find this section of the Iozone
run rules amusing... ( as it seems to echo your comments :-)
--------------
Review of results:
Unlike other benchmarks, there is no review required for the results to
be accepted.
There are several reasons why this is not needed.
1. We are all gentlemen and ladies and always act professionally.
2. We all respect the golden rule and treat others as we would
like to be treated.
3. If you lie or cheat, you will only discredit yourself and your
company.
4. There is no way you won't get caught. The benchmark is publicly
available for free.
Your customers will download it and check the platform before
they accept the
machine or pay for it.
5. If your company publishes bogus results that can not be
reproduced, this may be
interpreted as false advertising. Who knows, it may even get
your company a nice
lawsuit from a competitor.
6. In general, if you feel guilty about your results, then don't
make them available for others to see.
---------------
Enjoy,
Don Capps
[gfsd] Re: iozone license free or non-free,
Iozone <=