Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures

[Camm Maguire]

Greetings!  Is there any tester option to output a period or something
after so many minutes of progress with no output?  print.cons.random.1
is timing out on most autobuilders.

Take care,

"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:

> I've added three new tests to misc.lsp that gcl (25 Nov 2005 cvs HEAD)
> fails on.  The common bug appears to be that the compiler is not evaluating
> all the arguments to numerical comparison forms when there are three or
> more arguments.
> 
>       Paul
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah