Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures

[Camm Maguire]

Greetings!  Once again, can't tell you how valuable this exchange is.
Ball is again in your court.  Again, survived 2k/1000 random tester
iterations for me, but of course this is not definitive.  That said,
this mod wa very simple -- I had obviously forgotten to separate the
bindings by cons arguments.

Take care,

"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:

> Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Thanks!  OK, a retreat to a yet more conservative position.  What is
> > committed now passed 2k random-tester iterations for me.
> 
> But not, unfortunately, for me:
> 
> Test MISC.453 failed
> Form: (funcall (compile nil
>                          '(lambda (a) (* a (setf a 2) a (identity 5))))
>                 3)
> Expected value: 60
> Actual value: 90.
> 
> I have some local changes to my copy of the random tester that may be
> improving its detection rate.  I can probably boost it more by making
> SETQ/F and n-ary arithmetic operators more likely.
> 
>       Paul
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah