[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures |
Date: |
27 Nov 2004 17:34:46 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Greetings, and thanks for the quick notice! I had introduced this
when speeding up certain binary operator function calls of more than
two arguments via compiler macros.
I think this should be fixed now. Please confirm, and review if time
permits. I am assuming I only need to ensure evaluation of arguments
which are of type cons and whose car is not 'quote.
Take care,
"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:
> I've added three new tests to misc.lsp that gcl (25 Nov 2005 cvs HEAD)
> fails on. The common bug appears to be that the compiler is not evaluating
> all the arguments to numerical comparison forms when there are three or
> more arguments.
>
> Paul
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/26
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures,
Camm Maguire <=
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/27
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/27
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/27
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/29
- Message not available
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/29
- RE: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Mike Thomas, 2004/11/29