[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] ManLUG Meeting 26th February 2011
From: |
Simon Ward |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] ManLUG Meeting 26th February 2011 |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Feb 2011 22:15:42 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 06:33:15PM +0000, Michael Dorrington wrote:
> >> Yes, although you won’t often see the Mail-Followup-To header in MUAs.
> >> You’re more likely to see it in the To header for mail sent to the
> >> man-lug list, assuming you subscribe to it.
The Mail-Followup-To header is set by my MUA, Mutt, by default, for
lists I am subscribed to. I think it serves a different, but
complementary purpose to List-Post, but I don’t think the debate needs
re‐hashing. Just a google for Mail-Followup-To will find D. J.
Bernstein’s page on it, and a further search for the same on the IETF
lists will find the discussion about the draft.
> The mail Simon sent to the ManLUG list had a To field of just:
>
> To: address@hidden
This may well have been re‐written, boo.
> There isn't List-Post header in Simon's ManLUG email.
ListServ, a proprietary mailing list software that is now mandated by
Manchester Universit, does not and does not intend to support various
List-* headers. I don’t particularly like proprietary software vendors,
but when they can’t even be arsed to implement open standards my
feelings involve words I won’t repeat on this list.
Simon
--
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved from a
simple system that works.—John Gall
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature