|
From: | Rob Myers |
Subject: | Re: [Fsfe-uk] Call for Evidence on Patents, Copyright, Enforcement, Competition and SME access to services |
Date: | Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:28:27 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
I know it's not quantitative evidence, but this is a fun paper - http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1746343"Intellectual property law has long been justified on the belief that external incentives are necessary to get people to produce artistic works and technological innovations that are easily copied. This Essay argues that this foundational premise of the economic theory of intellectual property is wrong. Using recent advances in behavioral economics, psychology, and business-management studies, it is now possible to show that there are natural and intrinsic motivations that will cause technology and the arts to flourish even in the absence of externally supplied rewards, such as copyrights and patents."
(via Groklaw) - Rob.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |