[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Advertising DRM on "defective" products
From: |
Shane M. Coughlan |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Advertising DRM on "defective" products |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:30:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060918) |
Simon Morris wrote:
> Reading this article by JJ
> http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/jj/jj_s_blog/let_s_remind_content_providers_to_their_obligation_to_mark_drmised_products
> Is this a requirement in the UK? If it is it would be interesting to
> follow up with vendors
I agree that this is a very interesting field. If vendors had to
display whether something was covered by DRM or not there is a
possibility people would feel less comfortable with the idea.
I'm sure the marketing people have taglines:
"DRM protected - to ensure your safety"
"DRM assured"
"DRM guaranteed"
"Free bonus feature: DRM"
The big question is how much awareness people have that DRM can be a
negative thing. I was pretty surprised by people on the street in
Zurich. While the majority didn't know what DRM was, those that took a
moment to speak generally didn't like the idea at all. If we can get
people to take a second to look at DRM (and if goods display when they
are covered by DRM) I think we'd see increased pressure to move away
from the technology.
Shane