|
From: | MJ Ray |
Subject: | Re: [Fsfe-uk] Re: Standing Orders, Postal Votes etc. |
Date: | Sat, 22 May 2004 20:36:05 +0100 |
On 2004-05-21 16:35:29 +0100 John Seago <address@hidden> wrote:
[...] What does the AFFS want its Constitution, Standing Orders, Rules, Electoral Procedures, etc., to actually do?
Personally, I want a constitution to be a stable framework that is acceptable to members and bankers, while leaving opportunity to grow; I want SO/Rules that are the minimum procedures necessary to be generally recognised as fair and productive.
These are conflicting pressures: stability safeguards increase length, while I think most want a short constitution (judging from feedback about the length of the amendment); fairness means that everyone should have chance to speak, while productivity means you sometimes have to end a discussion before they have. I'm never going to be 100% comfortable, but there's probably some wide range which will make me happy enough.
[...] Perhaps the best option would be an overhaul, and re-adoption of Constitution, to be as concise as possible.
As you know, I'm reluctant to play with the constitution any more than absolutely necessary yet, because it's relatively well-worn, but known to be incomplete. If we can put the simplest possible completion to it in the form of the Rules and let them run for a year or so, then I'd agree with replacing it if doesn't work.
I am prepared to be of what help I can, however it has to be realised that prescription painkillers leave me in a condition [...]
The help is appreciated. I suspect we have enough members who "step out" occasionally that people can understand that. I think we bought ourselves 10 or 11 months now before this becomes urgent again, so as long as all-out war doesn't erupt among the new frontdesk, we should be OK.
-- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing Help hack the EuroParl! http://mjr.towers.org.uk/proj/eurovote/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |