Re: Announcing FreeType 2.10.3

[Alexei Podtelezhnikov]

> As I said, I'm quite happy just changing our callbacks to be directly
> declared static functions. I just want to check that's what's intended,
> and that there isn't a replacement for/alternative to FT_CALLBACK_DEF()
> that we should be using.

So, in the absence of any alternative guidance, I'm going with the
change to explicitly define the gs/ft callbacks as static.

Sure! __fastcall is an outdated i386 attribute, so it seems. I do not think we are going to use FT_CALLBACK_DEF anytime soon.