[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open
From: |
Kenneth Stailey |
Subject: |
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:08:10 -0700 (PDT) |
Thanks
$ sudo /opt/freeipmi/sbin/ipmi-sensors -W assumeio
ID | Name | Type | Reading | Units | Event
48 | ACPI State | System ACPI Power State | N/A | N/A | 'S0/G0'
96 | PCISLOT AREA TEM | Temperature | 31.00 | C | 'OK'
160 | SCSI-Gb AREA TEM | Temperature | 40.00 | C | 'OK'
224 | PwrConectr1 TEMP | Temperature | 34.00 | C | 'OK'
288 | PwrConectr2 TEMP | Temperature | 24.00 | C | 'OK'
352 | CPU0 VRM TEMP | Temperature | 31.00 | C | 'OK'
416 | CPU1 VRM TEMP | Temperature | 29.00 | C | 'OK'
480 | CPU0 TEMP | Temperature | 54.00 | C | 'OK'
544 | CPU1 TEMP | Temperature | 50.00 | C | 'OK'
608 | V5MBRUN | Voltage | N/A | N/A | 'Limit
Not Exceeded'
656 | V2.5DUAL | Voltage | N/A | N/A | 'Limit
Not Exceeded'
704 | V3.3DUAL | Voltage | N/A | N/A | 'Limit
Not Exceeded'
752 | V5ALW | Voltage | N/A | N/A | 'Limit
Not Exceeded'
800 | V5DUA | Voltage | N/A | N/A | 'Limit
Not Exceeded'
848 | V3.3MBRUN | Voltage | N/A | N/A | 'Limit
Not Exceeded'
896 | CPU0 Pres | Processor | N/A | N/A |
'Device Inserted/Device Present'
944 | CPU1 Pres | Processor | N/A | N/A |
'Device Inserted/Device Present'
992 | FAN1 Fault | Cooling Device | N/A | N/A |
'Performance Met'
1040 | FAN2 Fault | Cooling Device | N/A | N/A |
'Performance Met'
1088 | FAN3 Fault | Cooling Device | N/A | N/A |
'Performance Met'
1136 | FAN4 Fault | Cooling Device | N/A | N/A |
'Performance Met'
1184 | FAN5 Fault | Cooling Device | N/A | N/A |
'Performance Met'
1232 | Pwr Sply1Pres | Power Supply | N/A | N/A |
'Device Inserted/Device Present'
1280 | Pwr Sply1Fault | Power Supply | N/A | N/A | 'State
Deasserted'
1328 | Therm-Trip | Processor | N/A | N/A | 'State
Deasserted'
--- On Wed, 9/15/10, Albert Chu <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Albert Chu <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open
> To: "Kenneth Stailey" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> Date: Wednesday, September 15, 2010, 6:24 PM
> Hey Kenneth,
>
> I got a beta.tar.gz up with my workaround. The
> workaround is "-W
> assumeio", which you can specify to ipmi-sensors and most
> of the tools.
> It'll do pretty much what is expected, which is to assume
> I/O w/ the
> base address even when it doesn't say so. When you
> compile, can you
> please try w/ --enable-debug and --enable-trace, so we can
> make sure
> that it's working as expected.
>
> The tar.gz can be downloaded:
>
> http://ftp.gluster.com/pub/freeipmi/qa-release/freeipmi-0.8.10.beta0.tar.gz
>
> Thanks,
>
> Al
>
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 10:02 -0700, Albert Chu wrote:
> > Hey Kenneth,
> >
> > Thanks for the info. I'll try and put a
> workaround into FreeIPMI to
> > deal with this. I decided to look at the IPMI
> kernel driver to see what
> > they are doing internally and found this:
> >
> >
> /* Note that technically, the lower bit of
> the base
> >
> * address should be 1 if the address is I/O and 0 if
> >
> * the address is in memory. So many systems get
> that
> >
> * wrong (and all that I have seen are I/O) so we
> just
> >
> * ignore that bit and assume I/O. Systems that
> use
> >
> * memory should use the newer spec, anyway. */
> >
> dmi->base_addr = base_addr &
> 0xfffe;
> >
> dmi->addr_space = IPMI_IO_ADDR_SPACE;
> >
> dmi->offset = 1;
> >
> > so they are just ignoring that bit and using I/O
> anyways. So I bet this
> > is what is going on in your motherboard w/ the IPMI
> kernel driver.
> >
> > Al
> >
> > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 06:20 -0700, Kenneth Stailey
> wrote:
> > > ipmi-sensors -D KCS --disable-auto-probe
> --driver-address=0xCA2
> > > --register-spacing=1
> > >
> > > does work
> > >
> > > --- On Tue, 9/14/10, Albert Chu <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Albert Chu <address@hidden>
> > > > Subject: Re: [Freeipmi-devel]
> ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open
> > > > To: "Kenneth Stailey" <address@hidden>
> > > > Cc: "address@hidden"
> <address@hidden>
> > > > Date: Tuesday, September 14, 2010, 7:23 PM
> > > > Hey Kenneth,
> > > >
> > > > I now see the full "path" of what's going
> on. The key
> > > > is the
> > > > 'IPMI_ADDRESS_SPACE_ID_SYSTEM_IO' bit, that
> indicates that
> > > > system IO
> > > > isn't supported w/ KCS.
> > > >
> > > > However, with the info from the ipmi-locate
> below, it
> > > > strongly suggests
> > > > that KCS is supported, but that maybe that
> bit was set
> > > > wrong. For fun,
> > > > could you give the following a try?
> > > >
> > > > ipmi-sensors -D KCS --disable-auto-probe
> > > > --driver-address=0xCA2
> > > > --register-spacing=1
> > > >
> > > > and see if that works? If it does,
> then we atleast
> > > > have something we
> > > > can point to HP and say there's an issue.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Al
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 15:28 -0700, Kenneth
> Stailey wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- On Tue, 9/14/10, Albert Chu <address@hidden>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm beginning to wonder if your
> motherboard
> > > > simply has an
> > > > > > interface that
> > > > > > is supported by the IPMI kernel
> driver but not
> > > > by
> > > > > > FreeIPMI's default
> > > > > > libraries. Could you run
> ipmi-locate real
> > > > quick to
> > > > > > see?
> > > > >
> > > > > Using unpatched ipmi-locate:
> > > > >
> > > > > address@hidden:~/src/freeipmi-0.8.9$ sudo
> rmmod ipmi_si
> > > > ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler
> > > > >
> > > > > address@hidden:~/src/freeipmi-0.8.9$ type
> ipmi-locate
> > > > > ipmi-locate is /usr/sbin/ipmi-locate
> > > > >
> > > > > address@hidden:~/src/freeipmi-0.8.9$
> ipmi-locate
> > > > --version
> > > > > ipmi-locate - 0.8.9
> > > > > Copyright (C) 2003-2010 FreeIPMI Core
> Team
> > > > > This program is free software; you may
> redistribute it
> > > > under the terms of
> > > > > the GNU General Public License.
> This program has
> > > > absolutely no warranty.
> > > > >
> > > > > address@hidden:~/src/freeipmi-0.8.9$ sudo
> ipmi-locate
> > > > > Probing KCS device using DMIDECODE...
> done
> > > > > IPMI Version: 1.5
> > > > > IPMI locate driver: DMIDECODE
> > > > > IPMI interface: KCS
> > > > > BMC driver device:
> > > > > BMC memory base address: 0xCA2
> > > > > Register spacing: 1
> > > > >
> > > > > Probing SMIC device using DMIDECODE...
> FAILED
> > > > >
> > > > > Probing BT device using DMIDECODE...
> FAILED
> > > > >
> > > > > Probing SSIF device using DMIDECODE...
> FAILED
> > > > >
> > > > > Probing KCS device using SMBIOS...
> done
> > > > > IPMI Version: 1.5
> > > > > IPMI locate driver: SMBIOS
> > > > > IPMI interface: KCS
> > > > > BMC driver device:
> > > > > BMC memory base address: 0xCA3
> > > > > Register spacing: 1
> > > > >
> > > > > Probing SMIC device using SMBIOS...
> FAILED
> > > > >
> > > > > Probing BT device using SMBIOS...
> FAILED
> > > > >
> > > > > Probing SSIF device using SMBIOS...
> FAILED
> > > > >
> > > > > Probing KCS device using ACPI...
> FAILED
> > > > >
> > > > > Probing SMIC device using ACPI...
> FAILED
> > > > >
> > > > > Probing BT device using ACPI... FAILED
> > > > >
> > > > > Probing SSIF device using ACPI...
> FAILED
> > > > >
> > > > > Probing KCS device using PCI... FAILED
> > > > >
> > > > > Probing SMIC device using PCI...
> FAILED
> > > > >
> > > > > Probing BT device using PCI... FAILED
> > > > >
> > > > > Probing SSIF device using PCI...
> FAILED
> > > > >
> > > > > KCS device default values:
> > > > > IPMI Version: 1.5
> > > > > IPMI locate driver: DEFAULT
> > > > > IPMI interface: KCS
> > > > > BMC driver device:
> > > > > BMC I/O base address: 0xCA2
> > > > > Register spacing: 1
> > > > >
> > > > > SMIC device default values:
> > > > > IPMI Version: 1.5
> > > > > IPMI locate driver: DEFAULT
> > > > > IPMI interface: SMIC
> > > > > BMC driver device:
> > > > > BMC I/O base address: 0xCA9
> > > > > Register spacing: 1
> > > > >
> > > > > BT device default values:
> > > > > SSIF device default values:
> > > > > IPMI Version: 1.5
> > > > > IPMI locate driver: DEFAULT
> > > > > IPMI interface: SSIF
> > > > > BMC driver device: /dev/i2c-0
> > > > > BMC SMBUS slave address: 0x42
> > > > > Register spacing: 1
> > > > --
> > > > Albert Chu
> > > > address@hidden
> > > > Computer Scientist
> > > > High Performance Systems Division
> > > > Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
> > > >
> > > >
> --
> Albert Chu
> address@hidden
> Computer Scientist
> High Performance Systems Division
> Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
>
>
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open, (continued)
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open, Albert Chu, 2010/09/14
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open, Kenneth Stailey, 2010/09/14
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open, Albert Chu, 2010/09/14
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open, Kenneth Stailey, 2010/09/15
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open, Albert Chu, 2010/09/15
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open, Albert Chu, 2010/09/15
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open, Kenneth Stailey, 2010/09/15
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open, Albert Chu, 2010/09/15
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open,
Kenneth Stailey <=
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open, Kenneth Stailey, 2010/09/22
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] ipmi_ctx_find_inband: device already open, Albert Chu, 2010/09/23