[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Unsorted init script tuning
From: |
Al Chu |
Subject: |
Re: [Freeipmi-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Unsorted init script tuning |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Sep 2009 10:23:14 -0700 |
Hey Jan,
A thought just came up in regards to your 9/9 patch.
If we were to consistently prefix "freeipmi-" in front of everything,
would that also make us LSB compliant? And perhaps make all parties
happy?
Al
On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 10:01 -0700, Al Chu wrote:
> Hey Jan,
>
> Thanks for the patches. Because this is a pretty big change (will be
> bigger if I use patch 9/9), I'll only apply to the head branch. I hope
> to release 0.8.1 beta in the not to distant future.
>
> As a whole, I think all the patches are fine. I actually don't have an
> issue for patch 9/9. However, it conflicts with a previous Redhat
> patch :-) I had the naming scheme you propose in the patch (not having
> freeipmi prefixed in front of init scripts and such). However, Ben
> Woodard @ Redhat said I had to put the prefix in front to pass rpmlint
> which requires the prefix for naming daemons and init scripts.
>
> I've CCed Ben. Perhaps you guys can debate what takes priority. I'm
> fine with either one. But since two Redhat requests are conflicting,
> I'm not sure which distro rule wins out :-)
>
> Al
>
> On Wed, 2009-09-23 at 12:45 +0200, Jan Safranek wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > here comes short sequence of various small and stupid fixes in bmc-watchdog
> > and
> > ipmidetectd initscripts. The goal is to make them LSB-compliant, with proper
> > exit codes and actions, which is required by Fedora guidelines.
> >
> > I am maintainer of Fedora packages and I can have these changes there as
> > Fedora
> > patches, but you might find some of them interesting. I intentionally made
> > the
> > patches as small as possible, so you can pick only some of them.
> >
> > Feel free to comment any of the patches, I expect you won't like all of them
> > (especially the last one :).
> >
> > Jan
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freeipmi-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://**lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freeipmi-devel
> >
--
Albert Chu
address@hidden
Computer Scientist
High Performance Systems Division
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
- [Freeipmi-devel] [PATCH 1/9] Initscript should return '5' when 'program is not installed', (continued)
- [Freeipmi-devel] [PATCH 1/9] Initscript should return '5' when 'program is not installed', Jan Safranek, 2009/09/23
- [Freeipmi-devel] [PATCH 2/9] Return '6' if there is no config file, Jan Safranek, 2009/09/23
- [Freeipmi-devel] [PATCH 3/9] Add sample configuration file for ipmidetectd, Jan Safranek, 2009/09/23
- [Freeipmi-devel] [PATCH 4/9] Don't start running service, Jan Safranek, 2009/09/23
- [Freeipmi-devel] [PATCH 5/9] Reload operation is not supported by the daemons, Jan Safranek, 2009/09/23
- [Freeipmi-devel] [PATCH 6/9] Add missing actions, Jan Safranek, 2009/09/23
- [Freeipmi-devel] [PATCH 7/9] Return proper exit code, Jan Safranek, 2009/09/23
- [Freeipmi-devel] [PATCH 8/9] Rename lockfiles, Jan Safranek, 2009/09/23
- [Freeipmi-devel] [PATCH 9/9] Remove freeipmi- prefix from initscript, Jan Safranek, 2009/09/23
- Re: [Freeipmi-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Unsorted init script tuning, Al Chu, 2009/09/23