[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] lisp/ob-scheme.el
From: |
Ihor Radchenko |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] lisp/ob-scheme.el |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Mar 2023 09:32:19 +0000 |
Zelphir Kaltstahl <zelphirkaltstahl@posteo.de> writes:
>>> + "Expand :var header arguments given as VARS."
>>> + (mapconcat
>>> + (lambda (var)
>>> + (format "(define %s %S)" (car var) (cdr var)))
>> Is there any reason why you use %s for variable name? Previously it was
>> formatted with escapes (using %S).
>
> That was me thinking: "The name of the variable should just be itself, not
> wrapped in double quotes, because in Scheme I cannot create a variable as
> (define "abc" 123)". But maybe I misunderstood %s and %S. I also do not know,
> how elisp's `print' treats its arguments. Will use 2 times %S then.
The main difference between %S and %s can be demonstrated using the
following:
(insert (format "%s" 'symbol\#w\ spaces))
(insert (format "%S" 'symbol\#w\ spaces))
Basically, if symbol name contains funny chars, reader may need to have
them escaped. %S does the escaping, while %s does not.
Of course, %S escapes according to Elisp reader, not Scheme.
I am not sure if Scheme syntax allows escapes in symbol names.
If not, there should be no real difference.
Also, `print' is the same as %S.
>> Also, previous version quoted the variable value with "'". Why didn't
>> you do it here?
>
> I am not sure I understand what you are referring to in the previous version.
> Do
> you mean that `print' quoted variable values with a single quote? Do you mean
> this part of the previous code:
>
> (print `(,(car var) ',(cdr var)))
>
> ?
Yes, but upon closer look, it should not matter. Your code will work
just fine.
>>> + (concat (org-babel-expand-header-arg-vars:scheme vars) body))
>> `mapconcat' you used in `org-babel-expand-header-arg-vars:scheme' does
>> not add trailing newline, unlike done previously.
> Am I not adding a newline? I think I do?:
I meant after variable definitions.
You have
(concat (org-babel-scheme-expand-header-arg-vars vars) body)
but string returned by `org-babel-scheme-expand-header-arg-vars' will
not have final newline after the very last define.
> I have a question or suggestion:
>
> When I save the file in Emacs, my Emacs turns all the tabs in there into
> spaces.
> Probably my own custom global config's choice about indentation. Could a
> general
> mode line thing be added to avoid that and nail down the current formatting
> style, so that contributors only need to allow Emacs to run those settings
> and
> then not need to care about it? Currently the indentation style seems to be a
> mix of tabs and spaces.
This is something about your setup overriding Org mode project defaults.
If you open org-mode/.dir-locals.el, you will see that we enable
indent-tabs-mode. If you still do not get it enabled, you probably
set indentation defaults aggressively it in your config via hooks or
something similar.
> And one more question:
>
> Does the name of the patch file matter? Git changed the name and I will
> attach
> it as it was created by git. Hope that's alright.
Patch file name does not matter.
--
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
- Re: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values, (continued)
- Re: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values, Bruno Barbier, 2023/03/08
- Re: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values, Zelphir Kaltstahl, 2023/03/08
- [BUG] Inconsistent global/local :var assignments in ob-* for lisps and non-lisps (was: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/09
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent global/local :var assignments in ob-* for lisps and non-lisps (was: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values), Zelphir Kaltstahl, 2023/03/10
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent global/local :var assignments in ob-* for lisps and non-lisps (was: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/11
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent global/local :var assignments in ob-* for lisps and non-lisps (was: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values), Zelphir Kaltstahl, 2023/03/11
- Re: [BUG] Inconsistent global/local :var assignments in ob-* for lisps and non-lisps (was: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values), Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/12
- [PATCH] lisp/ob-scheme.el, Zelphir Kaltstahl, 2023/03/19
- Re: [PATCH] lisp/ob-scheme.el, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/22
- Re: [PATCH] lisp/ob-scheme.el, Zelphir Kaltstahl, 2023/03/25
- Re: [PATCH] lisp/ob-scheme.el,
Ihor Radchenko <=
- Re: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/09
- Re: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values, Zelphir Kaltstahl, 2023/03/10
- Re: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/11
- Re: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/09
- Re: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values, Daniel Kraus, 2023/03/09
- Re: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/10
- Re: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values, Zelphir Kaltstahl, 2023/03/10
- Re: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values, Zelphir Kaltstahl, 2023/03/07
- Re: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values, Ihor Radchenko, 2023/03/08
Re: org-babel guile source block bug in handling multiple values, Max Nikulin, 2023/03/07