[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?
From: |
Tim Cross |
Subject: |
Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be? |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Jun 2022 06:55:54 +1000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.8.0; emacs 29.0.50 |
Ypo <ypuntot@gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks, Bruno
>
> I've debugged it manually because (keymap-lookup) doesn't seem to exist in my
> emacs, if that's possible.
>
> The problem comes from:
>
> (define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-u C-n") #'org-next-item)
>
> If I eval that line, "C-u C-SPC" stops working on org-mode.
>
> Same problem in runemacs -q. Is it a bug?
>
You cannot use C-u like this.
The C-u is a binding to the 'universal argument'. Your line breaks that
binding so that it no longer works. What you have done is (sort of)
created a new binding which shadows the old universal argument binding
and sets up C-u as a prefix. Now, when you hit C-u emacs is waiting for
C-n.
You will need to use some other key binding. This can be difficult as
most of the good ones are already used. Packages like free-keys can help
identify spare/unused bindings. This is one reason I like evil-mode - I
have a wealth of available bindings, most of which easy to access
without leaving the keyboard (or 'home' row). For example, in org mode,
I have j/k for down/up line, S-j/S-k for down/up heading and M-j/M-k for
down/up list item.
- Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?, (continued)
- Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?, Bruno Barbier, 2022/06/24
- Message not available
- Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?, Bruno Barbier, 2022/06/25
- Message not available
- Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?, Ypo, 2022/06/26
- Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?, Bruno Barbier, 2022/06/26
- Message not available
- Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?, Ypo, 2022/06/26
- Re: C-SPC works; C-u C-SPC doesn't. How could be?,
Tim Cross <=