Re: Concatenate properties

[Tyler Grinn]

John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

> I like the variable idea. I would make it a concatenation string for
> joining. That way “” would concatenate the way Tyler wants, “ “ would
> preserve current behavior, and “,” could lead to a comma separated
> list for example. Other things like “\n” might lead to a column, etc. 

I'm not a huge fan of the variable idea because it would make it
impossible to include both behaviors in a single file, whereas extending
the syntax maintains any existing properties that used '+'.