[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [BUG] org-mode binds C-c C-TAB, which seems illegal [9.5 (9.5-g0a86a
From: |
Kévin Le Gouguec |
Subject: |
Re: [BUG] org-mode binds C-c C-TAB, which seems illegal [9.5 (9.5-g0a86ad @ /home/il/.config/emacs/elpa/org-9.5/)] |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Nov 2021 00:17:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Ingo Lohmar <ingo.lohmar@posteo.net> writes:
> It seems the change was introduced in
> 565361eb698b0b39c1d823ad1565f5bd88fa2034 and persists.
>
> Can people actually enter "C-c C-TAB" into their emacs (how?), or has
> everybody has just bound another key in their config?
Mmm, I can't seem to input C-c C-TAB either. IIUC (but maybe I don't),
this makes sense because
- Emacs translates the function key <tab> into the control character
TAB=^I when no modifiers are added. I.e. this can be triggered by
hitting <tab> or <control>+i:
> (local-set-key (kbd "TAB") (lambda () (interactive) (message "TAB-ish!")))
- But Emacs can't translate <control>+<tab> into "C-TAB", because C-TAB
means "control+control+i", which I guess is not representable at the
key code level or something? Hopefully someone can explain this
better.
(?\C-\t does return something though, and it's consistent with what (kbd
"C-TAB") returns, so I guess there's no reason why Emacs couldn't
translate C-<tab> to C-TAB like it does <tab> to TAB? 🤷)
FWIW, however you decide to fix this, I'd be very grateful if org-cycle
remained bound to TAB, since I'm one of those weirdos who actually hits
<control>+i for TAB instead of <tab>…