Re: wip-cite status question and feedback

[Bruce D'Arcus]

But ...

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 9:17 AM Bruce D'Arcus <address@hidden> wrote:

...

> I can't see that it's necessary to have a fourth, because I think the
> result of that would be this, which doesn't make any sense.
>
> 4.  "Doe blah blah {2017}"/"Doe blah blah {[3]}" ->
> author-in-text+suppress-author command

... notwithstanding that, I think Nicolas' latest proposed syntax
would support this anyway.

[citet:-@doe17]