[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: wip-cite status question and feedback
From: |
Bruce D'Arcus |
Subject: |
Re: wip-cite status question and feedback |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Apr 2020 06:56:10 -0400 |
Just one question, Richard ...
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 5:50 AM Richard Lawrence
<address@hidden> wrote:
[...]
> I think it is worth pointing out to Bib(La)TeX users that it is useful
> to avoid a proliferation of citation commands in Org syntax. The syntax
> discussed so far achieves this by "factoring out" formatting information
> that BibLaTeX puts into the command into other parts of the syntax and
> into the choice of citation stylesheet. For example, instead of having
> \footnotecite and \parencite as separate commands, you can just have a
> single cite command, and the choice of stylesheet determines whether
> citations get formatted as footnotes or as in-text parenthetical
> citations or as something else.
Before the question, I did just want to add that this is an excellent point.
[...]
> My experience is that it's typically just two (e.g. parenthetical and
> author-in-text), and my memory of the earlier conversation was that most
> people agreed.
Just to align what you're saying and what I'm saying:
I see three commands in the pandoc syntax: standard/parenthetical,
author-in-text, and suppress-author; that look like so:
[@doe17]
@doe17
-@doe17
Implicit in what you wrote is the last one is not needed.
The question, then: Is that what you're saying; we don't need suppress-author?
I think I actually agree, though will add a topic that came up in the
CSL implementation discussion for the author-in-text styles in the
past few days.
Here's a common way a citation might be integrated in a narrative text:
Doe, by contrast, found negative results (2017).
So we have the author name in-text, than some text, then the year-only citation.
The traditional way to do that in pandoc is to use the suppress-author
command at the end.
Doe, by contrast, found negative results [-@doe17].
So the piece of information I refer to above is that one of the CSL
implementers (Frank Bennett) figured out how to make the above
example an author-in-text variant, so that you don't need
suppress-author, and the entire sentence is the citation.
He did this by adding an optional "infix" variable to the citation.
So in that example, you would have:
- command: "author-in-text"
- citekey: "doe17"
- infix: "by contrast, found negative results"
This is arguably an edge case, but it does relate to the question of
whether we need two (standard and author-in-text) or three commands
(adding the suppress-author).
One could make the reasonable argument (I think, though not everyone
would agree) that the workaround for the above example is to use
author-in-text command but restructure the sentence:
@doe17, by contrast, found negative results.
>From that perspective, I guess we indeed need only two commands:
standard (parenthetical) and author-in-text.
Bruce
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, (continued)
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Bruce D'Arcus, 2020/04/13
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, denis . maier . lists, 2020/04/13
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Joost Kremers, 2020/04/13
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Stefan Nobis, 2020/04/13
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Richard Lawrence, 2020/04/18
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Joost Kremers, 2020/04/15
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Richard Lawrence, 2020/04/18
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback,
Bruce D'Arcus <=
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Richard Lawrence, 2020/04/18
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Bruce D'Arcus, 2020/04/18
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Bruce D'Arcus, 2020/04/18
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Denis Maier, 2020/04/18
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, denis . maier . lists, 2020/04/18
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Richard Lawrence, 2020/04/19
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Nicolas Goaziou, 2020/04/25
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Bruce D'Arcus, 2020/04/25
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Nicolas Goaziou, 2020/04/25
- Re: wip-cite status question and feedback, Bruce D'Arcus, 2020/04/25