emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug: HTML not formatted correctly from R source code block [9.3.6 (9


From: Steven Delean
Subject: Re: Bug: HTML not formatted correctly from R source code block [9.3.6 (9.3.6-23-g01ee25-elpaplus @ /home/opdfa/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20200309/)]
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 03:07:01 +0000

Hi Jack,

Thanks for your response.

Yes, I am using :session evaluation here, set using #+PROPERTY:

However, ":results value html" does not work for me. In fact, this produces no
table output at all in the resulting exported html file.

The output sent to the R :session buffer is printed correctly (when using
either :results value html or :results output html). As you say, it is the
exporter that is removing ">" from the output.

If I remove :session evaluation, I also get no output at all from these code
blocks in the exported html.

The change has been introduced within the last 12 months, as my scripts
exported with correct html formatting when I used them for last years' classes.

Best regards,
Steve

On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 17:17:48 -0700
Jack Kamm <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hi Steve,
>
> Steven Delean <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > HTML table produced from a source code block (using R code) does not display
> > because html code is not formatted correctly in the exported html output.
>
> I believe this is the same issue as reported here:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2020-02/msg00267.html
>
> Though, that thread was for ":session" blocks, and it's unclear whether
> you're using session or non-session evaluation here.
>
> Anyways, that thread suggests that ":results value html" works
> correctly, does switching to that work for you?
>
> If I'm correct, the basic problem is that ob-R tries to remove
> interactive shell prompts like ">" from the output. This can also cause
> other problems. I think it can be fixed by changing ob-R to use
> `ess-eval-region' to evaluate code, I'll try to submit a patch for this
> after 9.4 is released.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]