[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?
From: |
Rasmus |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section? |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Jan 2015 11:21:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
> Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> As said, I'd prefer load hyperref via org-latex-hyperref-template, but
>> it's probably too big a change too late. Though, it would resolve the
>> "issue" that if I do
>>
>> (setq org-latex-default-packages-alist
>> (delete '("" "hyperref" nil)
>> org-latex-default-packages-alist))
>>
>> Hypersetup is still inserted.
>
> The issue is not to remove hyperref, which is a default package for
> a good reason. The problem is to require titletoc before hyperref.
I was putting this to further support another solution, namely moving
hyperref to a single defcustom, allowing hyperref to be inserted after all
other header-lines.
> IOW, this is orthogonal to the problem at hand.
I disagree.
>> Unless I've managed to convenience you otherwise I will add a footnote
>> explaining and recommending the following snippet
>>
>> (with-eval-after-load 'ox-latex
>> (require 'cl)
>> (let* ((packages (mapcar (lambda (elt) (and (listp elt) (nth 1 elt)))
>> org-latex-default-packages-alist))
>> (pos (position "hyperref" packages :test 'equal))
>> (titletocp (member "titletoc" packages)))
>> (when (and pos (not titletocp))
>> (push '("" "titletoc" nil)
>> (nthcdr pos org-latex-default-packages-alist)))))
>
> It is way too opaque IMO. Suggesting to put ("" "titletoc" nil) before
> ("" hyperref nil) should be enough.
That's what it does... But without the need of having a direct copy of
org-latex-default-packages-alist in your init.el. I'm not suggesting to
put the snippet there without any prose.
—Rasmus
--
When in doubt, do it!
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/01/11
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Rasmus, 2015/01/11
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/01/12
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Rasmus, 2015/01/12
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/01/12
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Rasmus, 2015/01/12
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/01/13
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?,
Rasmus <=
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/01/13
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Rasmus, 2015/01/13
- Re: [O] Table of contents for just one section?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/01/13