Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties

[Rasmus]

Eric Schulte <address@hidden> writes:

>>
>> I also ran across this need. What I had in mind was that certain todo
>
>> types would be treated as inline.
>> For instance, if "P" was a member of this hypothetical
>> org-inline-todo-keywords, then
>>
>> * P a paragraph
>>   some contents
>>
>> would be rendered as
>>
>> some contents
>>
>> by the exporter, no matter the backend.
>>
>> Such a feature is more generic and would be useful in other contexts ;
>> and the LaTeX-related issues discussed in this thread would be solved
>> using something like
>>
>> * INLINE appendix
>>   \appendix
>> * Appendix 1
>>
>
> Why TODO types rather than a tag?  IMO using a TODO type would conflate
> task management and document structuring.  What do you think about the
> attached patch which should add this functionality to the core.

I would be happy to see this change in core, as I use
ignoreheading-like tags all of the time.  On the other hand it's not
particularly elegant, but it's already in ox-beamer.el, so that's
probably OK.

Thanks,
Rasmus

-- 
Er du tosset for noge' lårt!