Re: [O] How do I specify the language for a :results code block

[Sean O'Halpin]

Hi,

Taking a slightly different approach, you could use the :post header
argument to wrap the results in a source block.

See http://orgmode.org/org.html#post (from which the example below is derived).

For example, you could use something like this:

  #+OPTIONS: d:RESULTS

  * Example

  #+name: eg-1
  #+begin_src sh :results replace drawer :exports results :post
wrap-src(text=*this*)
  head -n 3 demo.v
  #+end_src

  Output
  #+results: eg-1

  * Utils                                                           :noexport:
  #+name: wrap-src
  #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var text="" :results raw
  (concat "#+BEGIN_SRC coq\n" text "\n#+END_SRC")
  #+end_src

BTW I answered a question similar to this on Stack Overflow recently
(http://stackoverflow.com/questions/20194347/org-mode-with-code-example-as-html/20232922#20232922)
- must be something in the air.

Regards,
Sean

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Alan Schmitt
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Sébastien,
>
> address@hidden writes:
>
>>> Exporting if the result is not in the buffer is fine. I tried adding a
>>> ":results replace" as inner header argument to the call line and to the
>>> fetchcoq block, but it does not change anything.
>>>
>>> How can I tell the call line to replace the results when exporting?
>>
>> The syntax of the call line is:
>>
>>     #+call: <NAME>[<HEADER-ARGS-FOR-BLOCK>](<ARGUMENTS>) 
>> <HEADER-ARGS-FOR-CALL-LINE>
>>
>> So, you should add your option either in [] after the name, or at the end of
>> the line -- I'm always hesitating about where to put the right stuff (not so
>> enough clear yet in my mind)...
>
> I tried both, and neither works. Here is an org file showing the
> problem:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> #+name: testcall
> #+BEGIN_SRC sh :exports none :results raw
> echo "#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp"
> echo "(+ 1 2)"
> echo "#+END_SRC"
> #+END_SRC
>
> Test fails:
> #+call: testcall() :results raw
>
> #+RESULTS:
> #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
> (+ 1 2)
> #+END_SRC
>
> Test fails:
> #+call: testcall[:results replace]() :results raw
>
> #+RESULTS:
> #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
> (+ 1 2)
> #+END_SRC
>
> Test fails:
> #+call: testcall() :results raw replace
>
> #+RESULTS:
> #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
> (+ 1 2)
> #+END_SRC
>
> Test succeeds (results not already in the file):
> #+call: testcall() :results raw
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> If you export this, you'll see that only the last call generates the
> expected output.
>
> Alan
>