[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] org-schedule vs org-time-stamp
From: |
Paul Rudin |
Subject: |
Re: [O] org-schedule vs org-time-stamp |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Sep 2013 20:43:46 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
"Sebastien Vauban" <address@hidden>
writes:
> Paul Rudin,
>
> Paul Rudin wrote:
>> I'm not clear on how these two are intended to be used. The former
>> prefixes the timestamp with "SCHEDULED:" but I'm not sure what practical
>> consequences this has. Items appear in the agenda either way.
>
> You should absolutely read the chapter 8 ("Dates and Times") of the Org
> manual.
>
> In summary, active timestamps only will appear on the day of the timestamp.
> It's good for meetings or birthdays or events that naturally only occur at a
> certain day.
>
> SCHEDULED timestamps indicate when you want to start working on a task. Such
> items will appear every day, on and on, in your agenda until you mark them
> done.
>
Ah yes, I see. Thanks.