[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] syntax for blocks that the exporter should not render?
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [O] syntax for blocks that the exporter should not render? |
Date: |
Thu, 5 Sep 2013 05:34:36 +0200 |
On 3.9.2013, at 17:32, Matt Price <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> certain lines are not rendered by the org exporter, but are instead
> interpreted as instructions, e.g.:
>
> #+AUTHOR: Matt Price
>
> I'm using org2blog/wp, which is only partially converted to the new
> exporter. It works pretty well, but not perfectly. It has the neat
> feature that, when I insert a link to a local image, it will upload
> that image to wordpress and link to the uploaded file. TO keep track
> of the location of those images, it writes lines like this to the org
> file:
>
> #+/home/matt/Matt_headshots/Matt Price/IMG_9367_.jpg
> http://2013.hackinghistory.ca/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/wpid-IMG_9367_2.jpg
>
> Recently I've noticed that these lines are actually being rendered by
> the underlying html exporter before export.
I don't think this is the right behavior, such lines should not be rendered.
Suvayu is right, with a space after the # they are treated as commendt, but I
think
they should also be ignored with the plus.
Nicolas, what is the reasoning behind rendering them?
Thanks
- Carsten
> I can (sort of) fix this
> by adding a filter to the exporter (thanks again Nicolas!):
>
> ---------
> (add-to-list 'org-export-filter-paragraph-functions
> 'matt-org-export-filter-paragraph-function)
> (defun matt-org-export-filter-paragraph-function (paragraph backend info)
> "removes comments from export"
> (when (org-export-derived-backend-p backend 'html)
> (replace-regexp-in-string "^#\+.*$" "" paragraph)
> ))
>
> but it would be better if I could get the underlying exporter to just
> ignore these lines. I thought that the leading #+ was enough to get
> org to treat these lines as non-text -- but I guess I'm wrong! Anyone
> know a solution?
>
> Thanks!
> Matt
>
- [O] syntax for blocks that the exporter should not render?, Matt Price, 2013/09/03
- Re: [O] syntax for blocks that the exporter should not render?, Suvayu Ali, 2013/09/04
- Re: [O] syntax for blocks that the exporter should not render?,
Carsten Dominik <=
- Re: [O] syntax for blocks that the exporter should not render?, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/09/05
- Re: [O] syntax for blocks that the exporter should not render?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/05
- Re: [O] syntax for blocks that the exporter should not render?, Suvayu Ali, 2013/09/05
- Re: [O] syntax for blocks that the exporter should not render?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/09/05
- Re: [O] syntax for blocks that the exporter should not render?, Matt Price, 2013/09/05
- Re: [O] syntax for blocks that the exporter should not render?, Matt Price, 2013/09/05
- Re: [O] syntax for blocks that the exporter should not render?, Jambunathan K, 2013/09/05