[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [PATCH] Improve configurability of ox-koma-letter
From: |
Rasmus |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [PATCH] Improve configurability of ox-koma-letter |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:05:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Viktor,
>> >> In a similar spirit to subject is firsthead. First head is displayed
>> >> by default in scrlttr2 as far as I recall, which is annoying.
>> >
>> > Is firsthead something that you change on a letter-by-letter basis? Or
>> > do you configure it once for your letters and never change it? In the
>> > latter case the configuration can be moved of to an LCO file. In the
>> > former case an option would be nice. I had to actually change the
>> > options I introduced so far for different letters (e.g., I don't want
>> > foldmarks if I send the letter by email).
>>
>> How I use scrlttr2: I rarely use firsthead as I find ugly. I use
>> firstfoot all of the time and I change it regularly. E.g. for some
>> letters I include bank addresse. Still, I see your point.
>
> So firsthead would be a boolean export option whereas firstfood would be
> a variable to set its content? I can see the use.
Both take whatever LaTeX you'll throw at them (within reasons) so
neither is boolean. I use a table with varying information for my
firstfoot and nothing for my first head, but if you had a business
letter you'd maybe have a logo up there or what not. But again, the
question is whether it should be a LCO file or Org.
One thing I'd like to do when time permits is to make a firstfood
argument that takes a table name as an input, simply because tables
are much nicer to work with in Org. But again it might be an
overkill. . .
–Rasmus
--
. . . It begins of course with The Internet. A Net of Peers.
- Re: [O] [PATCH] Improve configurability of ox-koma-letter, (continued)
Re: [O] [PATCH] Improve configurability of ox-koma-letter, Viktor Rosenfeld, 2013/04/22
Re: [O] [PATCH] Improve configurability of ox-koma-letter, Rasmus, 2013/04/22
Re: [O] [PATCH] Improve configurability of ox-koma-letter, Bastien, 2013/04/22