Re: [O] [PATCH] Improve configurability of ox-koma-letter

[Rasmus]

Viktor Rosenfeld <address@hidden> writes:

>> Yeah, I guess it's true.  Still, since foldmarks depends on which
>> envelopes you have at hand it might make sense to have it accept a
>> string.  In lisp-terms a string is still t.  On the other hand the
>> current approach is consistent with your approach above so that's a
>> merit.
>
> The more I think about it the more I agree that you should be able to
> set any value of foldmarks. The only problem I see is that for other
> boolean options one can use `t' whereas for foldmarks one would need to
> use `true' (because `t' is a valid configuration value for foldmarks).
> But as long as that's documented I see no problem. I will post a patch,
> once Alan applies my previous patches.

I don't know the details of the exporter well enough on this detail,
but perhaps it can be utilized that t ≠ "t"; if that's true in the
exporter as well.  In normal lisp (characterp "t") => t and
(characterp t) nil.  But I'm not sure if t would be transformed before
being able to check. . . 

Thanks,
Rasmus

-- 
May the Force be with you