Re: [O] ox-html.el removal

[Christopher Schmidt]

Detlef Steuer <address@hidden> writes:
> But: The papers the FSF asked you to sign were constructed for exactly
> this case I assume.

That's not right.

    https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html

I am not a copyright lawyer.  So is everyone else subscribed to this
list.  The FSF's copyright clerk should assist on this issue.

#+BEGIN my2cents
If Jambunathan does not want code he wrote to be part of Org any more,
I'd respect his wish.  At first sight this is a loss for Org.  This
does not need to be the end, though.  GSoC is coming up, rewriting
specific exporter look like great projects.

Jambunathan did not mention what is going to happen to his code.

Jambu, are you going to maintain the code you wrote separately.  If so,
is code free, libre and upwards compatible to future Org releases?
#+END

A long yet somewhat relevant read:

    https://lwn.net/Articles/529522/
    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel/6465

        Christopher