[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Exporter interface question
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Exporter interface question |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:10:27 +0100 |
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
> On 28.2.2013, at 13:30, Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> I agree, but I think then also setting the mark need to take care to
>>> set the mark in the base buffer. Will do this.
>>
>> AFAICT, this is not necessary. Indirect buffers share markers with base
>> buffer.
>
> I think it is necessary. If I move a marker to a position
> in a buffer and another marker to the same position in a connected
> indirect buffer, both markers are different and point to different
> buffers. So if I start an export from an indirect buffer, the
> dispatch marker will point to the indirect buffer. If I later
> compare the marker-buffer with (org-base-buffer (current-buffer)) I
> do get a mismatch. So if you want to compare to org-base-buffer,
> I think I clearly need to set the marker to a position in the base
> buffer.
Then what about comparing base buffer for both entities?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- Re: [O] Exporter interface question, (continued)
- Re: [O] Exporter interface question, Carsten Dominik, 2013/02/27
- Re: [O] Exporter interface question, Carsten Dominik, 2013/02/27
- Re: [O] Exporter interface question, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/02/27
- Re: [O] Exporter interface question, Carsten Dominik, 2013/02/28
- Re: [O] Exporter interface question, Carsten Dominik, 2013/02/28
- Re: [O] Exporter interface question, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/02/28
- Re: [O] Exporter interface question, Carsten Dominik, 2013/02/28
- Re: [O] Exporter interface question, Nicolas Goaziou, 2013/02/28
- Re: [O] Exporter interface question, Carsten Dominik, 2013/02/28
- Re: [O] Exporter interface question,
Nicolas Goaziou <=