[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Two modifications for source blocks processing (will be in 7.9.2

From: Thomas S. Dye
Subject: Re: [O] Two modifications for source blocks processing (will be in 7.9.2)
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:28:57 -1000

Hi Seb,

"Sebastien Vauban"
<address@hidden> writes:

> Hi Bastien,
> Bastien wrote:
>> this is to advertize two small modifications wrt source blocks
>> processing.
>> 1) Please use ":results drawer" instead of ":results wrap" to insert
>>    results like this:
>>    #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :results drawer
>>    (message "a")
>>    #+END_SRC
>>    #+RESULTS:
>>    :RESULTS:
>>    a
>>    :END:
> OK. That name is clearly better!
>> 2) Support for ":results org" has been removed.
> Why don't we have anymore "#+begin/end_org" blocks while we still have
> "#+begin_html" and "#+begin_LaTeX" blocks?  Org as the language seemed normal
> to insert blocks in Org-syntax.
> How will Org constructs be supported, for example headlines in the old
> "#+begin/end_org" blocks -- with the "," used for protecting the export?
> #+begin_src org
> ,* This is an headline
> ,This is some text.
> #+end_src
>>    You can either insert the results with ":results raw" or "results drawer"
>>    if you need to tell the exporter to include/exclude the results (by
>>    including/excluding the :RESULTS: drawer from export.)
> Will ":RESULTS:" drawers be included by default, to mimic the current support
> of "#+begin/end_org" blocks?
> Best regards,
>   Seb

:results org was a synonym for :results raw, so I think "small change"
here probably means that support for the synonym was dropped.

#+begin/end_org blocks should still work with the :wrap header argument,
 which hasn't been altered, IIUC.

All the best,

Thomas S. Dye

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]